ryu can suck it. too mainstream lolz if you notice my characters in every fighting game is either characters that nobody plays, chinese or they have tits...haha best would be a combination of 3 XD oh and Capos :) but yes i know that ryu is pretty straight forward and probably the best to start out with for a new player. But meh, i'll take my chances with the characters i find interesting. I mean i didn't start tekken with mishimas or Asuka. I went for Capos, Julia, Nina/Anna, Raven, Yoshi and all the weirdos. Still don't know how to play mishimas and do ewgf haha can do "turtle ho" tho...aka slow ass f~d~df+2...fuck just frame. thanks for all the input. i've been reading lots but now i just need to put it into execution :) On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > not all shotos are eay to play. > > ryu is best to start with. > > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:34:04 +0000 > > > Fuck that shit > > Was also told to start with a shoto. Tried it and hated it. Fuck all > shotos. > > Just play who you like > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:28:22 +0000 > > Di when learning sf4 , pickup ryu. best advice I can give you. > > I didn't like the game at al , but after I played with ryu for a lengthy > period the game started to make sense. Chojin beat the living cwap outa me > with his ryu , it forced me to level and learn the game. > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:22:21 +0200 > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Probably Yun. You'll need a bit of practice for his Genei Jin combos but > they are pretty straight forward. No fireballs though. > > Juri is one of the best zoners in the game, but her projectile storing > mechanic takes a long time to get used to. Doesn't have a DP for anti-air, > but has one of the best anti-air normals in the game. > > Dhalsim is quite simple to learn and very effective but his playstyle is > unique. His ground game is probably the least like Ryus. No DP, but you > can't really jump on him. > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and > simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and > zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc) > > Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim? > > El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't > know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had > some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist. > > Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena. > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > doubt it , MS is too cheap. > > they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out. > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000 > > > Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries. > I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and > Injustice. > *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx] > *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time > *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It will > still be there just not on the main stage. > > I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken > could've been in there. > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200 > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I agree with SAP, MM is a douch... > On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken. > It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play Kaz. > Right... > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > Agree on MainMan... > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Ashraf, just use June against him *lol* > > MainMan is an idiot. > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse < > ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > FT5 salty runback? Sure thing. > > But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch, > since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor. > > MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII > ========================================================================= > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. > > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > >