RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:37:52 +0000

not all shotos are eay to play.
 
ryu is best to start with. 
 
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:34:04 +0000




Fuck that shit

Was also told to start with a shoto.  Tried it and hated it.  Fuck all shotos.

Just play who you like

From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:28:22 +0000




Di when learning sf4 , pickup ryu. best advice I can give you.
 
I didn't like the game at al , but after I played with ryu for a lengthy period 
the game started to make sense. Chojin beat the living cwap outa me with his 
ryu , it forced me to level and learn the game.
 
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:22:21 +0200
Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Probably Yun.  You'll need a bit of practice for his Genei Jin combos but they 
are pretty straight forward.  No fireballs though.

Juri is one of the best zoners in the game, but her projectile storing mechanic 
takes a long time to get used to.  Doesn't have a DP for anti-air, but has one 
of the best anti-air normals in the game.


Dhalsim is quite simple to learn and very effective but his playstyle is 
unique.  His ground game is probably the least like Ryus.  No DP, but you can't 
really jump on him.




On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and simple 
mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and zoning, shoryuken 
for anti air, etc)



Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim?
El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't know 
until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had some 
practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist.



Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena.

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:






doubt it , MS is too cheap.
 
they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out.
 
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx



To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000







Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries.
I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and 
Injustice.

From: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]


Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi 

 




 he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It will 
still be there just not on the main stage.


 

I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken could've 
been in there.



Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200

Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



I agree with SAP, MM is a douch...
On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:




I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken.

It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn’t know how to play Kaz. 
Right…

 

From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Di Lhong

Sent: 10 February 2014 1:21 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

 


Agree on MainMan...



 


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Ashraf, just use June against him *lol*


 



MainMan is an idiot.






 


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:


FT5 salty runback? Sure thing.



But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch,

since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor.



MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII



=========================================================================

You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.



//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc





 






 




The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading
 "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and 
destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in 
reliance on it, is prohibited
 and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are 
subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client 
engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail 
and any attachments that do not
 relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by 
it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.







The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.






KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.






This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.
                                          



                                                                                
                                          

Other related posts: