Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:43:08 +0200
The first one produces a paradox when you try to perform calculations on
limits (same as Lumi's example).
Second produces a paradox because even though all the statements are true,
the reality is different.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's not a paradox though, that's the question as to whether time is
> continuous.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
> *Sent:* 13 February 2014 12:33 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> Haha actually that wasn't one of Zeno's paradoxes. It's related to the
> paradoxes of limits that Lumi posted though.
>
> Zeno's paradox about motion went something like this:
>
> If motion can be broken down into instances, and instances are durations
> where no motion takes place and no time passes, how can motion take place
> at all?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Always "works" because infinity is undefined.
>
> I like Zeno's paradoxes.
>
> It always takes a finite amount of time greater than zero to move between
> any two points.
> There are an infinite number of points between any two points.
>
> Therefore, it takes an infinite amount of time to move between two points
>
> Therefore, motion is impossible.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> In the spirit of the interesting idea that was posted yesterday, here's
> a nifty paradox:
>
>
>
> http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/37327/infinity-1-paradox
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:05 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I think I knocked him out at a previous CTS tourney.
>
>
>
> Don't think he should be added to the mails yet, if he's actually serious
> about fighters then cool. But we've seen too many examples of randoms being
> added and then never seeing or hearing from them.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:58 AM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well, you may be in disbelief than LB.
>
> He is coming to the session. I should add him to the mails though.
>
> We've been playing for a bit now.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:43 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I dnt believe the sleepyforest wil say such things.
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:35:30 +0200
>
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Hey guys. Just chilling with SleepingForest9.
>
> Says that ChunLi sticks are gay and so is Chun. So yeah, its a ft10
> against Lumi.
>
> Just letting you guys know.
>
> On 11 Feb 2014 18:47, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> LOL. STFU man! :-D
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:52 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> ROFLMAO
>
> the new fragrance by GB
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:41:10 +0200
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
> > From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> >
> > DKNY
> > Don't Know Nothing You
> > =========================================================================
> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
> >
> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
Other related posts:
