Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:10:09 +0200

My Elf rapes your everyone by doing, as Illitrit would say, "scrubby stuff".


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:56 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Gb's elf: rsd "run stop die"
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:42:51 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> * If ST was a person it would be Nick , old but still as fierce as ever. *
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> Im pretty sure you are gna be stuck at doing qcf qcb qcfx2, dp motions.
> converting from tekken to sf is being comfortable in doing those motions.
> Ryu has all of these motions. once you have gone passed the "how do I do
> these motions phase" you can get on your way to playing the game and not
> focussing on the controller.
>
>
>
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/10/early-entrance-numbers-socal-regionals-2014-game-ssf4-ae-v2012-umvc3-smash-blazblue-and-more/
>
> All the 3d fighters are scoring low numbers, except for injustice, dunno
> when that train is gna die. ST is still going strong. If ST was a person it
> would be Nick , old but still as fierce as ever. BB is gna be HYPE YALL
> WOOOOOOOOPPPP. so glad its getting the attention it deserves.
> SoCal Regionals 2014 early registration numbers
> *Numbers as of February 10, 2014 5:35 p.m. PST*
>
> Super Street Fighter 4 Arcade Edition v2012 - 173
> Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 - 105
> Blazblue: Chrono Phantasma - 66
> Injustice: Gods Among Us - 59
> Killer Instinct - 45
> Super Smash Bros. Melee - 36
> King of Fighters 13 - 35
> Street Fighter X Tekken - 34
> Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo - 31
> Divekick - 30
> Persona 4: Arena - 29
> Tekken Tag Tournament 2 - 28
> Guilty Gear Accent Core +R - 25
> Dead or Alive 5 Ultimate - 21
> Mortal Kombat 9 - 21
> Skullgirls - 21
> Soul Calibur 2 HD - 18
> Soul Calibur 5 - 18
> Mobile Suit Gundam Extreme: Vs Full Boost - 17
> Virtua Fighter 5: Final Showdown - 13
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:01:48 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Ah ok. No doubt on Ryu. But he's the cover boy for the game lolz
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> Ryu's not actually a "simple" character.  He's just easy to learn the game
> with because you're forced to learn everything to use him effectively.
>
> Boxer, Guile and Honda are more simple because they have movesets with
> less risk attached (Dash Punch, Sonic Boom, Head butt) so you don't have to
> worry so much about how and when to use these moves, and what your
> alternatives are when your opponent can shut these moves down.
>
> On the other hand, Ryu's fireball is only safe in certain situations.
> Learning to throw fireballs with Ryu is deceptively hard.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ryu can suck it. too mainstream lolz if you notice my characters in every
> fighting game is either characters that nobody plays, chinese or they have
> tits...haha best would be a combination of 3 XD oh and Capos :)
>
> but yes i know that ryu is pretty straight forward and probably the best
> to start out with for a new player. But meh, i'll take my chances with the
> characters i find interesting. I mean i didn't start tekken with mishimas
> or Asuka. I went for Capos, Julia, Nina/Anna, Raven, Yoshi and all the
> weirdos. Still don't know how to play mishimas and do ewgf haha can do
> "turtle ho" tho...aka slow ass f~d~df+2...fuck just frame.
>
> thanks for all the input. i've been reading lots but now i just need to
> put it into execution :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, lindsey kiviets 
> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> not all shotos are eay to play.
>
> ryu is best to start with.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:34:04 +0000
>
>
> Fuck that shit
>
> Was also told to start with a shoto.  Tried it and hated it.  Fuck all
> shotos.
>
> Just play who you like
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:28:22 +0000
>
> Di when learning sf4 , pickup ryu. best advice I can give you.
>
> I didn't like the game at al , but after I played with ryu for a lengthy
> period the game started to make sense. Chojin beat the living cwap outa me
> with his ryu , it forced me to level and learn the game.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:22:21 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Probably Yun.  You'll need a bit of practice for his Genei Jin combos but
> they are pretty straight forward.  No fireballs though.
>
> Juri is one of the best zoners in the game, but her projectile storing
> mechanic takes a long time to get used to.  Doesn't have a DP for anti-air,
> but has one of the best anti-air normals in the game.
>
> Dhalsim is quite simple to learn and very effective but his playstyle is
> unique.  His ground game is probably the least like Ryus.  No DP, but you
> can't really jump on him.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and
> simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and
> zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc)
>
> Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim?
>
> El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't
> know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had
> some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist.
>
> Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets 
> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> doubt it , MS is too cheap.
>
> they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000
>
>
> Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries.
> I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and
> Injustice.
>  *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>  he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It will
> still be there just not on the main stage.
>
> I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken
> could've been in there.
>  ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I agree with SAP, MM is a douch...
> On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken.
> It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play Kaz.
> Right...
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>  Agree on MainMan...
>
>  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Ashraf, just use June against him *lol*
>
>  MainMan is an idiot.
>
>  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> FT5 salty runback? Sure thing.
>
> But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch,
> since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor.
>
> MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel?
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII
>  =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: