[THIN] Re: OT: Dell PE 1855 Blade Servers
- From: "Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com" <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Um I wasn't comparing the hardware...I was comparing the companies and their
stature in the industry.
JK
---------------------------------
From: roger.riggins
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 12:27 PM
To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Dell PE 1855 Blade Servers
I still don?t get it. If there is no comparison in hardware, then you
should be able to rattle off some differences that make it so.
Roger Riggins
Network Administrator
Lutheran Services in Iowa
w: 319.859.3543
c: 319.290.5687
http://www.lsiowa.org
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:18 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Dell PE 1855 Blade Servers
You are reading between the lines. I was mearly stating to Roger that both
IBM and HP hardware have a bigger stake in the server business and are more
committed to it then Dell ever was or ever will be. I am sure that dell
equipment runs just fine and serves your purpose but there really is no
comparison. Dell still needs to grow up and decide what kind of company it is
going to be. IBM and HP are already there.
JK
Evan Mann <emann@com> wrote:
I've got a couple 7 year old Dell PE servers still running today that have
had zero problems. One of them is a data base server with heavy I/O and CPU
use (it's now relegated to a testing machine, too slow obviously). So my
experiences tells me that Dell can keep up just fine with the competitors in
terms of quality of equipment, uptimes, etc. My support experiences have been
top notch as well.
---------------------------------
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:07 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Dell PE 1855 Blade Servers
We have used HP/Compaq/Digital/Dec or whatever you want to call them
servers in our computer center for over 10 years. In all the time we have had
them the only thing that has ever failed on any of them (and it was a Digital
Proliant) was one of the re dundant power supplies and some hard disks over the
years. They are exceptional quality equipment. The only way a server is ever
going to catch fire is if the fan isn't working or it is not properly
ventilated. Dell is just fine for workstations but they need to stay out of the
server business. I've used IBM eServers to host my websites at my home for 8
years now...the thing has been running nonstop..no problems ever.
I don't believe that dell is as committed to the server business as IBM and
HP/Compaq/Digital are and have been over the last two decades. Dell simply
just can't compare to the other two...they haven't earned the respect to even
compete with them when it comes t o servers. You're kidding yourself if you
think any differently.
Jim
Matt Kosht <matt.kosht@ wrote:
I just got an 1855 and am starting to install PS 4.0 on it now. I
have had very good luck with Dell servers in general (we have about 50
in service) despite some comments here to the contrary. I have had a
Compaq server catch on fire, had numerous Compaqs with failed power
supplies, had a hosting customer who had horrendeous service problems
with IBM servers (every motherboard in their Citrix farm was replaced
2x)
We have one of the poorly designed (any Dell rep will admit this)
1655 blades which was the generation before the 1855 eluded to by
others here. Despite some difficulties with KVM compatibilty and
installing an OS it has performed with no nee d for service for 2
years. They seem to have learned a lot with the 1855 (time will
tell).
Dell is tough to beat on price and in my experience I have never seen
a competitive advantage to buying a more expensive HP/Compaq/IBM.
Service at the Gold level gets you Domestic support and 4 hr response
(we get more like 2 hrs here) and it's still cheaper than going IBM or
HP.
If you buy any kind of quantity from Dell they will let you eval one
(built to your spec) for nothing, for 60 days. I am sure you could
talk HP or IBM into it as well. Why not compare them head to head?
On 1/21/06, Rusty Yates wrote:
> I would like to know if anyone on this board has had any good or bad
> experience with the Dell PowerEdge 1855 Blade Servers. We are currently
> taking a hard look at using the Dell Blades for our Citrix Servers.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Rusty
Jim Kenzig
CEO The Kenzig Group
http://www.kenzig.com
Sponsorships Available!
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Terminal Services Downloads: http://www.thinhelp.com
Windows Vista: http://www.VistaPop.com
Virtualization: http://www.virtualize-it.com
Games: http://www.stressedpuppy.com
Other related posts:
