On 2010-12-05 at 19:29:17 [+0100], François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le 5 déc. 2010 à 19:22, Miroslav Stimac a écrit : > > >> Which of the two is the working one? And can you truncate the not working > >> one > >> to the original size and checksum again (respectively do that with a copy > >> in > >> case further tests with the unmodified on are necessary)? > >> > >> CU, Ingo > > > > Regarding the working one I have to test it again. > > Sadly, I did not write it on the CD label. > > I just know that one of the two is working and the other not. > > But I will check it in the next week. > > > > What do you mean with "And can you truncate the not working one to the > > original size and checksum again"? > > Something like: > > md5sum smallest.iso > > dd if=largest.iso of=largest-cut.iso bs=4096 count=101584 > > md5sum largest-cut.iso No, that (a) not the size of the original image and (b) rounds incorrectly. # md5sum of the original image md5sum haiku-nightly... # md5sums of the truncated CD contents dd if=recreated-file1 bs=6144 count=67673 | md5sum dd if=recreated-file2 bs=6144 count=67673 | md5sum CU, Ingo