[geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a false God
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:38:03 +1000
<Rather than cut and paste or spend lots of time cobbling together something
which won't convince you, have a look here http://members.aol.com/ckbloomfld/.
You could also read something about the man's activities for decades on the
subject here http://home.comcast.net/~errancy/issues/iss186.htm>
Paul.
You are trying to lure me into the devils den... Glad to go.. Might grab back
a few soles from the fire. umm souls. Phil.
Then to be logical, you would have to include your own notion, <Well no. Much
as Jack L tried on several times and I pointed out his error -- science is not
a religion. > and as they are all still then contradictory, none is right..
I do not call that logical.
Gotcha ! You came into this theme self admitted as a religious subject, not a
science subject. Even if it was only a logic subject in philosophy, which I was
referring to. Therefore in logic, you cannot negate religion as bunkim in total
simply because there is no uniformity, by saying that contradictory
philosophies makes all of them wrong.. Would you apply the same logic to
science, where contradictory theories, (these are philosopies) means none of
them is true? Its possible of course, and given the uncertainty principle, in
science , most likely.. But in religious philosophy, the base premise is
certainty. There is God. Where how and why, is where the disunity or
contradictions occur. And I would hazard these as allowable, and cannot negate
the base premise..There is God.
Philip in the morning.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 1:26 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a false God
Philip M
I'll intersperse in colour. (You can have teal -- you've been a good boy
recently).
Paul D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 20 October, 2008 9:21:46 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a false God
They can't all be right. <... since they differ one from another.> The
logical answer is that none are.
Paul D
Then to be logical, you would have to include your own notion, <Well no. Much
as Jack L tried on several times and I pointed out his error -- science is not
a religion. > and as they are all still then contradictory, none is right..
I do not call that logical.
A contradiction between a lie and a truth does not negate the truth. <Yes --
the truth endures.>
I also disagree with your assertion, "That they all contain error is just as
readily demonstrable." I'll just stick to a Bible.. Name a specific error
thats readily demonstrable? <Rather than cut and paste or spend lots of time
cobbling together something which won't convince you, have a look here
http://members.aol.com/ckbloomfld/. You could also read something about the
man's activities for decades on the subject here
http://home.comcast.net/~errancy/issues/iss186.htm>
Philip.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail.
Other related posts:
