[geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a false God
- From: "John Roodt" <johnroodt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:53:52 +1100
Hi Phil, and Paul
I'm in Sydney, Phil.
Also, I wasn't angered or offended by the word "brainwashed" -- it was
amusing. I'm not surprised that you and Marc consider me as brainwashed --
and vice versa. But isn't that what deception implies? One or other party is
sincere and almost right. But a miss is a miss? The tragedy of deception is
that the victim sincerely believes that he is correct -- but isn't?
It's understandable that Paul wonders at the conflict amongst the different
groups who share the same Bible. I'd respond to Paul but I think he's having
a dig at us and probably isn't interested in an answer.
Am I right Paul?
John
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:58 PM, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> On second thoughts, Paul, though I am reluctant to print during my happy
> hour, and this has been a four hour binge, I was nevertheless inspired to
> make a comment immediately.
>
> Your question is exactly the same in principle, as that thrown at Jesus on
> the Cross.. "If you are God, then deliver yourself from the cross and we
> will believe you..."
>
> Now how far do you think christianity upon which the calandar you use today
> was based , would have lasted if He had done that, and came down off the
> cross?
>
> He did better... He rose from the dead as promised, on Sunday, your first
> day of the week, before many and enough witnesses.. That is what started
> it.
>
> Philip.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Monday, October 20, 2008 6:13 PM
> *Subject:* [geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a
> false God
>
> Greetings all
> I usually pass over the theology stuff but this one seems tailor made for
> me.
> We are told God not only exists but is Omniscient, Omnipotent
> and Omnipresent. You'd think that He would be capable of protecting Himself
> from the efforts of His detractors but it seems that this is not so since
> the only way these detractors come to grief is if His followers visit harm
> upon them. Oddly, many of these detractors claim also to be His
> followers. One would think this OOO God would have been able to communicate
> His needs unambiguously to His creatures so that they would know, and could
> demonstrate unequivocally, who was a detractor and who a follower.
>
> Paul D
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
Other related posts:
