[geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a false God
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:58:49 +1000
On second thoughts, Paul, though I am reluctant to print during my happy hour,
and this has been a four hour binge, I was nevertheless inspired to make a
comment immediately.
Your question is exactly the same in principle, as that thrown at Jesus on the
Cross.. "If you are God, then deliver yourself from the cross and we will
believe you..."
Now how far do you think christianity upon which the calandar you use today was
based , would have lasted if He had done that, and came down off the cross?
He did better... He rose from the dead as promised, on Sunday, your first day
of the week, before many and enough witnesses.. That is what started it.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:13 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a false God
Greetings all
I usually pass over the theology stuff but this one seems tailor made for me.
We are told God not only exists but is Omniscient, Omnipotent and
Omnipresent. You'd think that He would be capable of protecting Himself from
the efforts of His detractors but it seems that this is not so since the only
way these detractors come to grief is if His followers visit harm upon them.
Oddly, many of these detractors claim also to be His followers. One would think
this OOO God would have been able to communicate His needs unambiguously to His
creatures so that they would know, and could demonstrate unequivocally, who was
a detractor and who a follower.
Paul D
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
