[geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a false God
- From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:26:59 +0000 (GMT)
Philip M
I'll intersperse in colour. (You can have teal -- you've been a good boy
recently).
Paul D
________________________________
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 20 October, 2008 9:21:46 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Zeitgeist : Jesus-Christ assumed to be a false God
They can't all be right. <... since they differ one from another.> The logical
answer is that none are.
Paul D
Then to be logical, you would have to include your own notion, <Well no. Much
as Jack L tried on several times and I pointed out his error -- science is not
a religion. > and as they are all still then contradictory, none is right..
I do not call that logical.
A contradiction between a lie and a truth does not negate the truth. <Yes --
the truth endures.>
I also disagree with your assertion, "That they all contain error is just as
readily demonstrable." I'll just stick to a Bible.. Name a specific error
thats readily demonstrable? <Rather than cut and paste or spend lots of time
cobbling together something which won't convince you, have a look here
http://members.aol.com/ckbloomfld/. You could also read something about the
man's activities for decades on the subject here
http://home.comcast.net/~errancy/issues/iss186.htm>
Philip.
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail!
http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail
Other related posts:
