[geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:44:13 +1000
Prove to me that Jupiter actually has an atmosphere. You can't. Bernie..
I think such would be difficult or impossible Bernie, so long as you are
wearing those blinkered goggles.
But I know you are just joking.. You are here to stir the agnostic pot..
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:10 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Paul,
"The average distance between Jupiter and the Sun is 778 million km."
Prove to me that Jupiter actually has an atmosphere. You can't.
90% of scientists can't even figure out the deception of 911
and also the Apollo Moon Landing Deception, so that doesn't say much
for their credibility or smarts.
Bernie
--- On Tue, 10/21/08, Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 8:37 AM
Bernie B
I've asked you several times and you have not responded. I ask again
-- if space is not a vacuum, and would strip away the Earth's atmosphere were
it orbiting the Sun, why doesn't Jupiter have its atmosphere stripped away?
Same for Saturn's rings AND its atmosphere? Ditto for Uranus and Neptune? (You
don't dispute that they orbit the Sun which orbits the Earth, do you? Indeed,
they orbit much faster in your model -- 'All the better to have your atmosphere
striped away my dear!' Why is it NOT so?
Paul D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October, 2008 2:32:25 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Philip,
No Flat Earth is here:
http://sites.google.com/site/earthdeception/noflatearth
When I said ( or was it when I wrote? ) that I didn't believe
outer space
was a vacuum, I meant that it was not a perfect 100.0000%
vacuum.
It could even be 99.9999% a vacuum but that would be enough
resistance to have an effect on the movement of the Earth so
that
it would nullify any heliocentricity hypthesiseseses, or however
one spells the plural word.
Bernie
--- On Mon, 10/20/08, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 11:58 PM
Very good Bernie. Thats gone to favorites.. I might find my
flywheel formula there.. . How come with all that behind you , you still come
out with jokes about a flat earth. and how space can blow you off the shuttle?
. Philip
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:31 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Physics Equations Formulas Calculator:
http://www.ajdesigner.com/index_physics.php
--- On Mon, 10/20/08, PETER CHARLTON
<peter.nambo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: PETER CHARLTON <peter.nambo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 4:56 PM
I was thinking today about this, I ride a
motorcycle or two, I have to lean the bike going around roundabouts to
counteract the centrifugal force, the same angle of lean if I go around a small
roundabout fairly slowly, or a large roundabout fairly quickly.
The centrifugal force then must be the speed
relative to the angle of curvature.
So, there has to be a formula to calculate
centrifugal force at any given speed around any given curve.
Though the earth spins quite fast, the angle of
curvature is quite small, would be interesting to see how this centrifugal
force compares to a gramophone record which spins quite slowly, but with a much
greater angle of curvature.
Pete Charlton
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:23 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Yes you are correct.. Its the peripheral
speed..perhaps... too hard for me. But getting back to your original question,
The natural shape to which a fluid would form is a sphere. around the centre of
gravity. There is a bulge at the equator, which the maths men have calculated
to be correct for the earths rate of spin. Likewise a lb of butter weighs more
in England than it does in Papua. Which means of course water has been moved
from the poles to the sea on the equator. distinct from other tidal effects.
I believe their assessment. However as the world
is not spinning, then as said elsewhere this force is due to the aether doing
the 24hour spin or rotation through and around the earth. The effect is the
same as any other body in the solar system that is spinning in the aether. Its
a matter of relative motions between matter and aether. .. demonstrated only
due to the unique place the earth occupies. A stumbling block for the
agnostics..
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: PETER CHARLTON
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:50 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
I would have thought it was the speed, rather
than the number of rotations that cause centrifugal force.
More revolutions cause more speed which is what
increases the centrifugal force.
If it was just the number of rotations, why can
the toy soldier stand up ok near the centre of said record, but move it out a
couple of inches whereas, still spinning the same amount of times, he falls
outward, not from wind resistance by the increased speed, but by increased
centrifugal force due to be further from the point of axis.
Pete
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 7:07 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Peter if the record is only turning 1 rev per
day, there cannot be the same effect on your toy soldier as happens when it is
doing 33 rpm. Im not expert, but this seems to be the key. Imagine your record
player doing only 1 rev per day, and then extending its size to a millionmiles
in diameter. The speed certainly increases the further out the toy soldier
walks, but the centrifugal force is tethered to the same centre of gravity.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: PETER CHARLTON
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:53 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Centrifugal force.
At the moment at work Iam getting people to
think by asking them how, with the equator spinning at 1038 miles an hour, and
the poles sationary, that all the earths water doesnt just slide down to the
equator with centrifugal force, especially considering how even the slight pull
of the moon is enough to drag the seas.
Can you scientific guys give an explaination as
to why this doent happen if the Earth really is spinning please?
There must be a formula as to the amount of
centrifugal foce that is at work at the equator compared to the poles.
Just putting a toy soldier on a spinning LP
record and it flys off as it gets away from the middle, how much more so must
water?
Pete Charlton
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
http://mail.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail.
Other related posts:
