[geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Deer Paul,
Before I answer your questions I have to ask you some
seemingly unrelated but Trick Questions.
1. Have one or more humans ever landed on the Moon?
2. Were one or more Muslims involved in orchestrating and carrying out
the 911 WTC attacks?
3. Have one or more "made on Earth" spacecraft ever landed on Mars?
Bernie
--- On Tue, 10/21/08, Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 8:37 AM
Bernie B
I've asked you several times and you have not responded. I ask again -- if
space is not a vacuum, and would strip away the Earth's atmosphere were it
orbiting the Sun, why doesn't Jupiter have its atmosphere stripped away? Same
for Saturn's rings AND its atmosphere? Ditto for Uranus and Neptune? (You don't
dispute that they orbit the Sun which orbits the Earth, do you? Indeed, they
orbit much faster in your model -- 'All the better to have your atmosphere
striped away my dear!' Why is it NOT so?
Paul D
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October, 2008 2:32:25 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Philip,
No Flat Earth is here:
http://sites.google.com/site/earthdeception/noflatearth
When I said ( or was it when I wrote? ) that I didn't believe outer space
was a vacuum, I meant that it was not a perfect 100.0000% vacuum.
It could even be 99.9999% a vacuum but that would be enough
resistance to have an effect on the movement of the Earth so that
it would nullify any heliocentricity hypthesiseseses, or however
one spells the plural word.
Bernie
--- On Mon, 10/20/08, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 11:58 PM
Very good Bernie. Thats gone to favorites.. I might find my flywheel formula
there.. . How come with all that behind you , you still come out with jokes
about a flat earth. and how space can blow you off the shuttle? . Philip
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:31 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Physics Equations Formulas Calculator:
http://www.ajdesigner.com/index_physics.php
--- On Mon, 10/20/08, PETER CHARLTON <peter.nambo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: PETER CHARLTON <peter.nambo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 4:56 PM
I was thinking today about this, I ride a motorcycle or two, I have to lean the
bike going around roundabouts to counteract the centrifugal force, the same
angle of lean if I go around a small roundabout fairly slowly, or a large
roundabout fairly quickly.
The centrifugal force then must be the speed relative to the angle of curvature.
So, there has to be a formula to calculate centrifugal force at any given speed
around any given curve.
Though the earth spins quite fast, the angle of curvature is quite small, would
be interesting to see how this centrifugal force compares to a gramophone
record which spins quite slowly, but with a much greater angle of curvature.
Pete Charlton
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:23 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Yes you are correct.. Its the peripheral speed..perhaps... too hard for me.
But getting back to your original question, The natural shape to which a fluid
would form is a sphere. around the centre of gravity. There is a bulge at the
equator, which the maths men have calculated to be correct for the earths rate
of spin. Likewise a lb of butter weighs more in England than it does in Papua.
Which means of course water has been moved from the poles to the sea on the
equator. distinct from other tidal effects.
I believe their assessment. However as the world is not spinning, then as said
elsewhere this force is due to the aether doing the 24hour spin or rotation
through and around the earth. The effect is the same as any other body in the
solar system that is spinning in the aether. Its a matter of relative motions
between matter and aether. .. demonstrated only due to the unique place the
earth occupies. A stumbling block for the agnostics..
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: PETER CHARLTON
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:50 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
I would have thought it was the speed, rather than the number of rotations that
cause centrifugal force.
More revolutions cause more speed which is what increases the centrifugal force.
If it was just the number of rotations, why can the toy soldier stand up ok
near the centre of said record, but move it out a couple of inches whereas,
still spinning the same amount of times, he falls outward, not from wind
resistance by the increased speed, but by increased centrifugal force due to be
further from the point of axis.
Pete
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 7:07 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
Peter if the record is only turning 1 rev per day, there cannot be the same
effect on your toy soldier as happens when it is doing 33 rpm. Im not expert,
but this seems to be the key. Imagine your record player doing only 1 rev per
day, and then extending its size to a millionmiles in diameter. The speed
certainly increases the further out the toy soldier walks, but the centrifugal
force is tethered to the same centre of gravity.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: PETER CHARLTON
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:53 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Centrifugal force.
At the moment at work Iam getting people to think by asking them how, with the
equator spinning at 1038 miles an hour, and the poles sationary, that all the
earths water doesnt just slide down to the equator with centrifugal force,
especially considering how even the slight pull of the moon is enough to drag
the seas.
Can you scientific guys give an explaination as to why this doent happen if the
Earth really is spinning please?
There must be a formula as to the amount of centrifugal foce that is at work at
the equator compared to the poles.
Just putting a toy soldier on a spinning LP record and it flys off as it gets
away from the middle, how much more so must water?
Pete Charlton
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail.
Other related posts:
