[geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:58:35 +1000

Very good Bernie. Thats gone to favorites..   I might find my flywheel formula 
there..  .  How come with all that behind you , you still come out with jokes 
about a flat earth. and how space can blow you off the shuttle? .  Philip
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bernie Brauer 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:31 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.


        Physics Equations Formulas Calculator:
        http://www.ajdesigner.com/index_physics.php

        --- On Mon, 10/20/08, PETER CHARLTON <peter.nambo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

          From: PETER CHARLTON <peter.nambo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
          Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.
          To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
          Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 4:56 PM


          I was thinking today about this, I ride a motorcycle or two, I have 
to lean the bike going around roundabouts to counteract the centrifugal force, 
the same angle of lean if I go around a small roundabout fairly slowly, or a 
large roundabout fairly quickly.

          The centrifugal force then must be the speed relative to the angle of 
curvature.

          So, there has to be a formula to calculate centrifugal force at any 
given speed around any given curve.

          Though the earth spins quite fast, the angle of curvature is quite 
small, would be interesting to see how this centrifugal force compares to a 
gramophone record which spins quite slowly, but with a much greater angle of 
curvature.

          Pete Charlton 
            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: philip madsen 
            To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
            Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:23 PM
            Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.


            Yes you are correct..  Its the peripheral speed..perhaps... too 
hard for me.  But getting back to your original question, The natural shape to 
which a fluid would form is a sphere. around the centre of gravity. There is a 
bulge at the equator, which the maths men have calculated to be correct for the 
earths rate of spin. Likewise a lb of butter weighs more in England than it 
does in Papua. Which means of course water has been moved from the poles to the 
sea on the equator. distinct from other tidal effects. 

            I believe their assessment. However as the world is not spinning, 
then as said elsewhere this force is due to the aether doing the 24hour spin or 
rotation through and around the earth. The effect is the same as any other body 
in the solar system that is spinning in the aether. Its a matter of relative 
motions between matter and aether. ..  demonstrated only due to the unique 
place the earth occupies.    A stumbling block for the agnostics.. 
            Philip. 
              ----- Original Message ----- 
              From: PETER CHARLTON 
              To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
              Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:50 PM
              Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.


              I would have thought it was the speed, rather than the number of 
rotations that cause centrifugal force.
              More revolutions cause more speed which is what increases the 
centrifugal force.
              If it was just the number of rotations, why can the toy soldier 
stand up ok near the centre of said record, but move it out a couple of inches 
whereas, still spinning the same amount of times, he falls outward, not from 
wind resistance by the increased speed, but by increased centrifugal force due 
to be further from the point of axis.

              Pete
                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: philip madsen 
                To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
                Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 7:07 AM
                Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Centrifugal force.


                Peter if the record is only turning 1 rev per day, there cannot 
be the same effect on your toy soldier as happens when it is doing 33 rpm. Im 
not expert, but this seems to be the key. Imagine your record player doing only 
1 rev per day, and then extending its size to a millionmiles in diameter. The 
speed certainly increases the further out the toy soldier walks, but the 
centrifugal force is tethered to the same centre of gravity.

                Philip. 
                  ----- Original Message ----- 
                  From: PETER CHARLTON 
                  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
                  Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:53 AM
                  Subject: [geocentrism] Centrifugal force.


                  At the moment at work Iam getting people to think by asking 
them how, with the equator spinning at 1038 miles an hour, and the poles 
sationary, that all the earths water doesnt just slide down to the equator with 
centrifugal force, especially considering how even the slight pull of the moon 
is enough to drag the seas.

                  Can you scientific guys give an explaination as to why this 
doent happen if the Earth really is spinning please?
                  There must be a formula as to the amount of centrifugal foce 
that is at work at the equator compared to the poles.
                  Just putting a toy soldier on a spinning LP record and it 
flys off as it gets away from the middle, how much more so must water?

                  Pete Charlton   

  __________________________________________________
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 

Other related posts: