[geocentrism] Re: Voyager
- From: geocentric@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:11:48 +0100
Well if you were arguing with hard core hoax believers they would just
accuse you of being part of the cover up - you did work for NASA after
all. You see how infurating it is arguing with poeple who just refuse
to be believe anything that doesn't suite them!
Philip wrote:
> I have to admit I am at a loss to understand Nevilles belief here. When I
> was on contract to NASA at Woomera South Australia, at the time when the
> Russian Cosmonaut got separated/lost from the first woman in space, despite
> all the so called cold war and security, all scheduled passes were cancelled
> and the whole facility was put at the disposal of Russians via interpreters
> I had to keep my antenna controls going full pelt just to follow the
> signals. (no automatic tracking antennas during those days.)Yet even then,
> along side our base there was an enormous deep space dish that pulsed out
> power so high that any bird flying over was a cooked chook. No one allowed
> outside without safty gear during a transmission phase. The point is that
> they were communicating with something a long way away, and the distance is
> accurately measured by the time lag for the answer to arrive.
>
> to go to all this trouble just for prestige, it would have been easier to
> just do it wouldn't you think.
>
> Which reminds me. As a hobbie radio amateur, called ham, I am sure that a
> lot of them at the time of the moon landings were monitoring and some
> participating in experiments. If they were any ways like me, and most
> hobbyists are, they would be most upset if their directional rigs picked up
> any bogus signals not emanating from the moon. and the earth in the correct
> sequence. Whilst not maybe skeptical we were certainly not gullible either.
> The amateur clubs continue to use the facilities for moon bounce
> communication today, and even have access to their own satellite repeater.
> I'm no astronomer, and seen the moon only via noculars. So what about the
> amateur astromers, with their bigger scopes. Could they have seen anything?
>
> Back to Mars. When the recent landing failed due to a faulty programmer
> putting in metric for imperial measurements, surely they would have covered
> that up easily, if they are so much into fraud.
>
> Philip.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 2:25 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Voyager
>
>
> Dear Rob,
>
> I have just read your e-mail, regarding Voyager 1 and 2.
>
> As I am totally and absolutely convinced that NASA has not landed anyone, or
> anything, on the Moon, Mars, or anywhere else, and that their claims of
> "gravity slingshots" are total rubbish, you will appreciate that Voyager 1
> and 2 are no trouble for me to explain - where they are I do not know, but
> one thing I do know is that they are not where you seem to believe them to
> be. I would therefore be far more surprised to learn that they are further
> out than the Moon, than I would be if one, or both, of them came down in
> your or my back garden.
>
> Having said that, I'm now back on vacation!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neville.
>
> "Glover, Rob" <Rob.Glover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Dr. Jones,
>
> The Voyagers 1 and 2 spacecraft were launched from Earth in 1977, and now
> over 25 years later, are at a distance of more than 8.4 billion miles from
> Earth, increasing continually as they head towards the stars.
>
> In a geocentric scenario, these 2 spacecraft are also, of course, now moving
> round the World at a speed of 2199114855 miles per hour, or 3.2 times the
> speed of light.
>
> Can you explain how they have reached this enormous speed, considering they
> have not fired their engines since leaving Earth, apart from for very small
> course corrections.
>
> I look forward to your considered reply. Thanks.
>
> Rob Glover.
Other related posts:
