Neville by his own admission is denying the existence of geosynchronous satellites. I don't know therefore how he can believe in the reality of intercontinental live television transmissions. Granted, he does not have to watch them himself (I am not a big sports fan either, my wife is paying more attention to the Olympics than I am!) but surely he must acknowledge that such broadcasts are taking place and that millions are in fact watching them. Rob. -----Original Message----- From: Jack Lewis [mailto:jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 18 August 2004 17:19 To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Voyager ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glover, Rob" <Rob.Glover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 10:07 AM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Voyager > > So, because you personally don't watch any international TV transmissions, > therefore you can claim that they don't exist. This is about the equivalent > of those Catholics who refused to look through Galileo's telescope at the > moons of Jupiter, preferring instead to argue them out of existence. Dear Rob, Are you suggesting just because Neville doesn't have a TV that puts him into denial over satellite TV? Don't be so silly, I know a number of people who do not have a TV because of the utter rubbish that is broadcast and I suspect that is why Neville doesn't. There are times when I feel like saving the TV fee and chucking the set out of the window. Jack This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.