[geocentrism] Re: Voyager
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 07:17:45 +1000
I personally do not judge the intellectual or special attributes of any man
upon there lack of the practical applications of science in some fields.
Just look at Alan. Whilst he has an excellent mathmatical mind, in relation
to science, this does not preclude him from maybe having a poor aptitude in
the physical application of theoretical physics. Now I am the reverse. I can
easily apply my limited theoretical aptitude to very practical applications.
Thus Rob, I accept geostat satellites and mars Rovers.
Yet that the things are really as they seem is based on trust. I trust I
have not been conned by some great conspiracy to defraud. I know its
unlikely, but there are alternatives to theses satellites for communication.
In every technical problem I have ever encountered or worked upon I have
always had this basic rule. "There is always another way"
Neville is overtly suspicious, with good reason. Science with almost
everything else has been hijacked. This is hidden in a mire of paranoia,
false and real, created and spontaneous. I think all is soon to become quite
clear. Just keep your eyes glued to the news, that is if your not directly
in the target area. I'm sure the shit is about to hit the fan. And its
Biblical.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glover, Rob" <Rob.Glover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:31 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Voyager
Neville by his own admission is denying the existence of geosynchronous
satellites. I don't know therefore how he can believe in the reality of
intercontinental live television transmissions. Granted, he does not have to
watch them himself (I am not a big sports fan either, my wife is paying more
attention to the Olympics than I am!) but surely he must acknowledge that
such broadcasts are taking place and that millions are in fact watching
them.
Rob.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Lewis [mailto:jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 August 2004 17:19
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Voyager
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glover, Rob" <Rob.Glover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 10:07 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Voyager
>
> So, because you personally don't watch any international TV transmissions,
> therefore you can claim that they don't exist. This is about the
equivalent
> of those Catholics who refused to look through Galileo's telescope at the
> moons of Jupiter, preferring instead to argue them out of existence.
Dear Rob,
Are you suggesting just because Neville doesn't have a TV that puts him into
denial over satellite TV? Don't be so silly, I know a number of people who
do not have a TV because of the utter rubbish that is broadcast and I
suspect that is why Neville doesn't. There are times when I feel like saving
the TV fee and chucking the set out of the window.
Jack
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any
attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
Other related posts:
