[geocentrism] Re: Voyager
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:55:34 +1000
I have to admit I am at a loss to understand Nevilles belief here. When I
was on contract to NASA at Woomera South Australia, at the time when the
Russian Cosmonaut got separated/lost from the first woman in space, despite
all the so called cold war and security, all scheduled passes were cancelled
and the whole facility was put at the disposal of Russians via interpreters
I had to keep my antenna controls going full pelt just to follow the
signals. (no automatic tracking antennas during those days.)Yet even then,
along side our base there was an enormous deep space dish that pulsed out
power so high that any bird flying over was a cooked chook. No one allowed
outside without safty gear during a transmission phase. The point is that
they were communicating with something a long way away, and the distance is
accurately measured by the time lag for the answer to arrive.
to go to all this trouble just for prestige, it would have been easier to
just do it wouldn't you think.
Which reminds me. As a hobbie radio amateur, called ham, I am sure that a
lot of them at the time of the moon landings were monitoring and some
participating in experiments. If they were any ways like me, and most
hobbyists are, they would be most upset if their directional rigs picked up
any bogus signals not emanating from the moon. and the earth in the correct
sequence. Whilst not maybe skeptical we were certainly not gullible either.
The amateur clubs continue to use the facilities for moon bounce
communication today, and even have access to their own satellite repeater.
I'm no astronomer, and seen the moon only via noculars. So what about the
amateur astromers, with their bigger scopes. Could they have seen anything?
Back to Mars. When the recent landing failed due to a faulty programmer
putting in metric for imperial measurements, surely they would have covered
that up easily, if they are so much into fraud.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 2:25 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Voyager
Dear Rob,
I have just read your e-mail, regarding Voyager 1 and 2.
As I am totally and absolutely convinced that NASA has not landed anyone, or
anything, on the Moon, Mars, or anywhere else, and that their claims of
"gravity slingshots" are total rubbish, you will appreciate that Voyager 1
and 2 are no trouble for me to explain - where they are I do not know, but
one thing I do know is that they are not where you seem to believe them to
be. I would therefore be far more surprised to learn that they are further
out than the Moon, than I would be if one, or both, of them came down in
your or my back garden.
Having said that, I'm now back on vacation!
Best wishes,
Neville.
"Glover, Rob" <Rob.Glover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Dr. Jones,
The Voyagers 1 and 2 spacecraft were launched from Earth in 1977, and now
over 25 years later, are at a distance of more than 8.4 billion miles from
Earth, increasing continually as they head towards the stars.
In a geocentric scenario, these 2 spacecraft are also, of course, now moving
round the World at a speed of 2199114855 miles per hour, or 3.2 times the
speed of light.
Can you explain how they have reached this enormous speed, considering they
have not fired their engines since leaving Earth, apart from for very small
course corrections.
I look forward to your considered reply. Thanks.
Rob Glover.
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any
attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
---------------------------------
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
Other related posts:
