[THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1

  • From: "Jason Benway" <benwayj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:20:19 -0500

Since this has been an ongoing discussion. I’ve used CSG in the past but now I 
want to setup the VPX so I can test the Ipad’s and Iphone with xenapp from 
outside. The VPX is a lot more complicated than CSG, does anyone have a good 
how to for just setting the VPX as a ICA proxy (the free stuff)




From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 2:12 AM
To: Webster; thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1


Maybe because the iPad isn't as critical as all that. 

An access gateway is a license cost and an infrastructure change - with the 
possibility that it replaces/works alongside an alternative that is already in 
place. Sure theres the free version - but even that needs a hypervisor. Sure 
that is free to license.. but there's a good amount of 'change'  here  

Effectively the receiver for an iPad is not 'free' outside of the office's 


----- Reply message -----
From: "Webster" <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, Dec 18, 2010 19:32
Subject: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

That sounds like exactly what Jo Harder keeps saying!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
> Question I have is, if the iPad is becoming critical at the customer site
> wouldn't they want to invest in AG?  For one, it's a supported
> and second if remote access becomes critical the access solution can
> be made HA.
> Don't get me wrong, CSG is great simple/small solutions but when they
> outgrow it's time to upgrade.
> Joe

For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
Follow ThinList on Twitter

Other related posts: