[THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1

  • From: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:24:03 -0700

Not to mention, where are they getting the money for the iPads themselves?




From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Greg Reese
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 8:08 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1


you can get an Access Gateway virtual appliance for less than $1000.  You
get mobile app ability which is for blackberry and droid too.  Plus easy as
pie encryption for your fat clients.  It's not such a bad deal.


If a company can afford to deploy citrx, but can't afford the extra
$700-$1000 for the Access Gateway, they've got bigger problems. 

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Jim Kenzig <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I guess but companies in this economy really do not have the dollars to buy
a box/licenses just so their people can use an iPad. It certainly doesn't
make any economic sense to me. 
Jim Kenzig 
http://www.kenzig.com <http://www.kenzig.com/> 

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Webster <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That sounds like exactly what Jo Harder keeps saying!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On

> Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1

> Question I have is, if the iPad is becoming critical at the customer site
> wouldn't they want to invest in AG?  For one, it's a supported
> and second if remote access becomes critical the access solution can
> be made HA.
> Don't get me wrong, CSG is great simple/small solutions but when they
> outgrow it's time to upgrade.
> Joe

For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
Follow ThinList on Twitter



Other related posts: