[THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
- From: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:24:03 -0700
Not to mention, where are they getting the money for the iPads themselves?
Joe
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Greg Reese
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 8:08 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
you can get an Access Gateway virtual appliance for less than $1000. You
get mobile app ability which is for blackberry and droid too. Plus easy as
pie encryption for your fat clients. It's not such a bad deal.
If a company can afford to deploy citrx, but can't afford the extra
$700-$1000 for the Access Gateway, they've got bigger problems.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Jim Kenzig <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I guess but companies in this economy really do not have the dollars to buy
a box/licenses just so their people can use an iPad. It certainly doesn't
make any economic sense to me.
Jim Kenzig
http://www.kenzig.com <http://www.kenzig.com/>
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Webster <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That sounds like exactly what Jo Harder keeps saying!
Webster
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
>
> Question I have is, if the iPad is becoming critical at the customer site
why
> wouldn't they want to invest in AG? For one, it's a supported
configuration
> and second if remote access becomes critical the access solution can
easily
> be made HA.
>
> Don't get me wrong, CSG is great simple/small solutions but when they
> outgrow it's time to upgrade.
>
> Joe
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
************************************************
Other related posts:
