[THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
- From: Jim Kenzig <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:01:26 -0500
*I guess but companies in this economy really do not have the dollars to buy
a box/licenses just so their people can use an iPad. It certainly doesn't
make any economic sense to me.
**Jim Kenzig
http://www.kenzig.com*
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Webster <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That sounds like exactly what Jo Harder keeps saying!
>
>
> Webster
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
> >
> > Question I have is, if the iPad is becoming critical at the customer site
> why
> > wouldn't they want to invest in AG? For one, it's a supported
> configuration
> > and second if remote access becomes critical the access solution can
> easily
> > be made HA.
> >
> > Don't get me wrong, CSG is great simple/small solutions but when they
> > outgrow it's time to upgrade.
> >
> > Joe
>
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> ************************************************
>
Other related posts:
