[SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single Processor

  • From: "Dimiter Popoff" <dp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:07:21 +0300

So you have seen many prototypes which operated continuously
for about 4 years and exhibit problems once they go into mass production.
Well, kucky me. I had no problems.

Dimiter

------------------------------------------------------
Dimiter Popoff               Transgalactic Instruments

http://www.tgi-sci.com
------------------------------------------------------




-------Original Message-------
> From: Kenneth W. Egan <kegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single 
> Processor
> Sent: Aug 11 '05 09:47
> 
>   ??
>  Depends upon the characterization of the silicon on both sides. So it’s a
>  statistics thing. How many units have you shipped ? This is the determining
>  factor, not one unit for a period of time.
>  
>  Overshoot is an issue for many silicon vendors. For example, one of TI's
>  DSP's call out max of 4.3v overshoot for 3.3v I/O on their SDRAM I/F. But
>  the real piece is the spec that indicates, not only 4.3v, but also only over
>  a max of 30% of the clock period. So this may indicate junction
>  heating/oxide breakdown issues with the process node, or design of their
>  device.
>  
>  I've seen plenty of prototypes that work fine, put them in mass production,
>  and these issues start cropping up.
>  
>  KWE
>  
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Dimiter Popoff [mailto:dp@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>  Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:56 AM
>  To: Kenneth W. Egan; aavinda12@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single
>  Processor
>  
>  Is about 4 years practically continuous operation good enough?
>  The design has demonstrated it.
>  
>  Dimiter
>  
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  Dimiter Popoff               Transgalactic Instruments
>  
>  http://www.tgi-sci.com
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  -------Original Message-------
>  > From: Kenneth W. Egan <kegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single
>  > Processor
>  > Sent: Aug 11 '05 05:21
>  >
>  >  The question might not be one of stability, but one of reliability in
>  > the  long term. Sure, you'll probably meet setup and hold to/from the
>  SDRAM.
>  >  However, SDRAM typically has some pretty hot drivers (that I've seen,  
>  > simulated and measured in circuit ) and the real issue is over
>  > stressing  The input protection on the receiver, i.e. overshoot issues.
>  >  
>  >  Failure modes in this case may not occur until much later in time.
>  >  
>  >  KWE
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  -----Original Message-----
>  >  From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On  Behalf Of Dimiter Popoff
>  >  Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:00 PM
>  >  To: aavinda12@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single
>  > Processor
>  >  
>  >  I have rooted 8 x8 SDRAMs to an 8240 without any terminations and it
>  > worked  remarkably stable. However, I had 64 data bits rather than 32.
>  >  I had put 4 SDRAM chips on top and 4 on the bottom of the board,
>  > practically  next to the CPU, no connectors between.
>  >  
>  >  Dimiter
>  >  
>  >  ------------------------------------------------------
>  >  Dimiter Popoff               Transgalactic Instruments
>  >  
>  >  http://www.tgi-sci.com
>  >  ------------------------------------------------------
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  -------Original Message-------
>  >  > From: Aravnda G <aavinda12@xxxxxxxxx>  > Subject: [SI-LIST]
>  > termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single  > Processor  > Sent: Aug
>  > 11 '05 03:29  >  >  Hi All,  >  I am working with a micro-processor
>  > conneted to 8 SDRAM with 12 address  lines to all SDRAMs and 32 data
>  > lines each to two sets of four SDRAMs. I was  wondering if anyone has
>  > managed to route this sort of topology without using  terminations. If
>  > so please send information on topology used. The IO are  lvttl
>  > compatible at 3.3V. Any input on routing possibilities is welcome.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Thanks & Regards,
>  >  >  Alex.
>  >  >
>  >  >  ---------------------------------
>  >  >  Yahoo! Mail
>  >  >  Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour  >  >  
>  > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >  To unsubscribe from si-list:
>  >  >  si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
>  > field  >  >  or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>  >  >  //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>  >  >
>  >  >  For help:
>  >  >  si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field  >  
>  > >  List FAQ wiki page is located at:
>  >  >                  http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>  >  >
>  >  >  List technical documents are available at:
>  >  >                  http://www.si-list.org  ;>  >  List archives are
>  > viewable at:
>  >  >  //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>  >  >  or at our remote archives:
>  >  >  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>  >  >  Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>  >  >  http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  -------Original Message-------
>  >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe from si-list:
>  >  si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>  >  
>  >  or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>  >  //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>  >  
>  >  For help:
>  >  si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>  >  
>  >  List FAQ wiki page is located at:
>  >                  http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>  >  
>  >  List technical documents are available at:
>  >                  http://www.si-list.org
>  >  
>  >  List archives are viewable at:
>  >  //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>  >  or at our remote archives:
>  >  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>  >  Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>  >  http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>  >    
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  
>  -------Original Message-------
>  
>  
>  
-------Original Message-------
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: