So you have seen many prototypes which operated continuously for about 4 years and exhibit problems once they go into mass production. Well, kucky me. I had no problems. Dimiter ------------------------------------------------------ Dimiter Popoff Transgalactic Instruments http://www.tgi-sci.com ------------------------------------------------------ -------Original Message------- > From: Kenneth W. Egan <kegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single > Processor > Sent: Aug 11 '05 09:47 > > ?? > Depends upon the characterization of the silicon on both sides. So it’s a > statistics thing. How many units have you shipped ? This is the determining > factor, not one unit for a period of time. > > Overshoot is an issue for many silicon vendors. For example, one of TI's > DSP's call out max of 4.3v overshoot for 3.3v I/O on their SDRAM I/F. But > the real piece is the spec that indicates, not only 4.3v, but also only over > a max of 30% of the clock period. So this may indicate junction > heating/oxide breakdown issues with the process node, or design of their > device. > > I've seen plenty of prototypes that work fine, put them in mass production, > and these issues start cropping up. > > KWE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dimiter Popoff [mailto:dp@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:56 AM > To: Kenneth W. Egan; aavinda12@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single > Processor > > Is about 4 years practically continuous operation good enough? > The design has demonstrated it. > > Dimiter > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Dimiter Popoff Transgalactic Instruments > > http://www.tgi-sci.com > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > From: Kenneth W. Egan <kegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single > > Processor > > Sent: Aug 11 '05 05:21 > > > > The question might not be one of stability, but one of reliability in > > the long term. Sure, you'll probably meet setup and hold to/from the > SDRAM. > > However, SDRAM typically has some pretty hot drivers (that I've seen, > > simulated and measured in circuit ) and the real issue is over > > stressing The input protection on the receiver, i.e. overshoot issues. > > > > Failure modes in this case may not occur until much later in time. > > > > KWE > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dimiter Popoff > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:00 PM > > To: aavinda12@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single > > Processor > > > > I have rooted 8 x8 SDRAMs to an 8240 without any terminations and it > > worked remarkably stable. However, I had 64 data bits rather than 32. > > I had put 4 SDRAM chips on top and 4 on the bottom of the board, > > practically next to the CPU, no connectors between. > > > > Dimiter > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Dimiter Popoff Transgalactic Instruments > > > > http://www.tgi-sci.com > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > > From: Aravnda G <aavinda12@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [SI-LIST] > > termination for routing 8 SDRAMs to single > Processor > Sent: Aug > > 11 '05 03:29 > > Hi All, > I am working with a micro-processor > > conneted to 8 SDRAM with 12 address lines to all SDRAMs and 32 data > > lines each to two sets of four SDRAMs. I was wondering if anyone has > > managed to route this sort of topology without using terminations. If > > so please send information on topology used. The IO are lvttl > > compatible at 3.3V. Any input on routing possibilities is welcome. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Alex. > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > Yahoo! Mail > > > Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject > > field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > > > For help: > > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > > http://www.si-list.org ;> > List archives are > > viewable at: > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > > or at our remote archives: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.org > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > or at our remote archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > > -------Original Message------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu