[pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: "tOM Trottier" <tOM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:22:36 -0400
Dear Speedy,
http://www.wilhelm-research.com/
Happy New Year, tOM
On Monday, January 01, 2007 at 17:47,
Speedy . <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrot
> Well, pigment ink jet prints are already far more permanent than our
> chemical colour photos, and perhaps even more long-lived than our
> silver prints and negatives. Besides, it's such a hassle doing
> separations....
>
> Happy New Year, tOM
>
> ---------------------------------------
> My resolution was to stay away from this debate in '07 and forward,
> and that is still my intention.
>
> BUT, couriosity has gotten the best of me. Where, pray tell, did
> this information come from and exactly how reliable is the source?
-- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur --
,__@ tOM Trottier
_-\_<, 758 Albert St., Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) N45.41235 W75.71345 +1 613 860-6633
<a href="http://Abacurial.com";>Abacurial Information Architecture</a>
Q, Q,
</ </ This world, after all our science and sciences, is still
(`-/---/-') a miracle; wonderful, inscrutable, magical and more,
~~@~~~~@~~~~~~ to whosoever will think of it. --Thomas Carlyle
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
