[pure-silver] Re: finding a new paper

  • From: Shannon Stoney <sstoney@xxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:26:21 -0600

The closest surface to Agfa 118 is in the Kentmere line as far as I've seen.
I haven't tried it yet as most of the customers that would have used it
switched to my digital printing.

I question the wisdom of stocking up on Agfa papers. Of all the papers that
I ever used, it was the most prone to age fog. Heck even boxes of the
shelves of dealers would be fogged. I hate to buy up a bunch of product just
to see it compromised by fog. And while you can over come that somewhat, it
is still less that perfect.

Forte was too green for my taste in Zonal Pro. Ilford WT with a little sepia
with a weak bleach and light selenium is nice.


I agree that Forte is a little green in Zonal Pro, especially under flourescent light. It looks a little less green, IMHO, if you use Agfa Neutol WA developer with it, but who knows how long that will be around.

By fogging, do you mean those funny little black specks that sometimes show up in the margins, or more substantial fogging than that?

--shannon


Eric


Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net http://ericneilsenphotography.com


 -----Original Message-----
 From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-
 bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christopher Woodhouse
 Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 3:26 PM
 To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: [pure-silver] Re: finding a new paper

 I love Agfa Classic and admit to buying a few boxes more than usual when
 their demise was apparent. From the calibration work I do for RH Design
 customers, I see a lot of papers from all over the world, (mostly European
 and occasionally China. IMHO there were only 3 companies that made good
 variable contrast papers, Agfa, Kodak and Ilford. By good, I'm referring
 to
 long controllable contrast range, as well as good blacks at soft grade
 settings and most importantly, consistency. I saw evidence of strange
 tonality at soft grades with many other papers, with portions of the tonal
 range virtually without contrast. I also could see colour shifts
 throughout
 the tonal scale (without toning).

 Agfa was my preferred choice, since with one paper I could achieve subtle
 cool or warm tones and its reaction to Selenium was especially useful
 pictorially. With Agfa and Kodak gone, we are in the hands of Ilford.
 Their
 coating plants are more advanced than others (or so I have been led to
 believe by ex-employees) and you can achieve most things with Multigrade
 IV
 and Warmtone together.

 Straight prints on Fibre are very similar, but for me MG IV takes on a
 magenta hue in Selenium, hence the reason to switch to Warmtone on
 selected
 images.

 I for one shall be returning to Ilford products once my Agfa paper
 expires.

 Regards Chris Woodhouse  ARPS
 www.ktphotonics.co.uk


On 17/2/06 23:17, "Shannon Stoney" <sstoney@xxxxxxx> wrote:

 > Sorry if this has already been discussed, but I am trying to find a
 > paper that substitutes for Agfa multigrade FB.  Today I tried Forte
 > polygrade FB, but so far I don't really like it.  Maybe I need to try
 > different dialings on the color head, but the images look sort of
 > flat to me, with poor separation in the highlights.  If I try for
 > more contrast, they get too dark in the shadows.  Also it has an
 > unpleasant greenish cast to me.  I am still using my old Agfa neutol
 > WA paper developer.  Could that be the problem?
 >
 > I guess my next attempt will be with Ilford.  Ilford paper, Ilford
 developer.
 >
 > Is there any consensus about what paper is closest to Agfa in scale?
 > I like the Agfa developer and some people say that somebody bought
 > the right to keep making it, but I am willing to switch.
 >
 > --shannon
 >
 ==========================================================================
 ====
 > ===============================
 > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
 subscribed,)
 > and unsubscribe from there.
 >





 ==========================================================================
 ===================================
 To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
 account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
 subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: