Tim Rudman wrote: > > Yes, I know what the image is Dana, and how it gets onto the print is > critical to how it communicates with the viewer - and therefore how > 'interesting' it is (to that viewer), or perhaps 'engaging' might be a > better term for what I mean. I'm not sure I follow "how it gets onto the print is critical". What do you mean by this? My point is that the image - the print - is the result. There's a process that results in a print, but the viewer doesn't see the process, or even really care about the process. The print stands alone. Dana ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.