Claudio Bonavolta wrote: > That's the same for the japanese photographer Adrienne mentionned: that's the > way he > clinically describes these urban landscapes to make us feel unconfortable. In > this case, > it's not only post-processing (eventual masking technique, ...) but also > pre-processing > (choice of equipment, point if view and lighting) Of course - if there wasn't already a basis of interesting geometric shapes, the sharpness would not add impact. > Will these images have the same impact taken "normally" ? I doubt it. At the same time, if someone used Taiji Matsue's process to shoot random portraits, would the images become interesting solely because of the process? I doubt that, as well. Cheers, Dana ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.