When is it NOT fun to drink and hold your breath as you run in circles? On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Rorac and I got so fucking drunk we literally rolled around on the floor > laughing. We thought it would be an awesome idea to drink like 20 shots then > hold our breath and spin around. LOL > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:32 PM, <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Lol friday night was l4d drinking game. I ended up winning... I think. 23 >> shots 6 of malibu 17 of bacardi and everyone else wimped out. Lightweights. >> >> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile >> ------------------------------ >> *From: * Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> >> *Date: *Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:33:00 -0500 >> *To: *<project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> *Subject: *[project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >> >> "a bottle of rum" Kent and I had over 20 shots each in the course of 4 >> hours. I think I was 23-24 shots deep day before Yosemite? Oh man, I think >> I scared the people in the shack. >> >> I remember hitting my knee too because I had to puke so bad in the car and >> it took like 10 - 15 minutes (or 1512 hours) to pull over so I could throw >> up. Haha. >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> LOL >>> >>> nick took a "leap of faith" like that and visited some of us when i loved >>> in california. >>> >>> we took him out to the woods then had a umm 20 mile hike out into the >>> wilderness >>> >>> "you gots a purty mouth nick" >>> >>> oh... on the drive over we had to stop in a pretty ghetto area cause nick >>> drank a bottle of rum by himself the night before (this was like 7am i >>> think). >>> >>> so he gets out, pukes, bangs on some tin shack and starts yelling hahaha >>> >>> oh man good times them were >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Matthew Freeland < >>> mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Well I'm going out to pittsburg in March for another lan if you want to >>>> get a drink. Preferably without threatening to kill and eat my wormly >>>> family >>>> members. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I live 10 minutes for Jersey. Yay. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Matthew Freeland < >>>>> mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Indeed, and if any of your are curious as to my dealing in the past >>>>>> months go check out http://pwnage.tv and check the l4d broadcasts. <3 >>>>>> >>>>>> In fact I just got back a few weeks ago from new jersey at a big lan >>>>>> called GXL and there's live video of me and the crew hanging out at lan >>>>>> center, fun times. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:02 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> its ok, you had smokers and tanks to contend with! :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:48 PM, <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm sowwy :( I won't let it happen again. >>>>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:48:27 >>>>>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yeah how dare you wurmz! I don't think you were assigned anything >>>>>>>> though :P but I'll bug you sometime soon, I'm sure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Freeland >>>>>>>> <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Well, glad to see all this conflict started and was resolved >>>>>>>> without my involvement, and it's wonderful to see everyone is friends >>>>>>>> again, >>>>>>>> now we can all go back to placing blame where it needs to be: That >>>>>>>> stupid >>>>>>>> wurmz guy who hasn't done anything in 4 months. GOD I hate that guy. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > -Wurmz >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:58 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> HERE IS ME Washing my hands of this deal, no big deal. We figured >>>>>>>> out there were some hangups, so now we can progress more efficiently. >>>>>>>> =) >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >>>>>>>> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> >> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:56 PM >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> High Five Alan =) >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >>>>>>>> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> >> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:10 PM >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> things hopefully will be better goin forward >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> as far as im concerned thats what really matters (: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> ::high fives to all:: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> and making mistakes is how you learn... if we never made mistakes >>>>>>>> we'd never learn anything... we are gaining valuable experience here >>>>>>>> (all of >>>>>>>> us) hehe (; >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> I agree as well, I have no idea how this got so out of hand and >>>>>>>> blown out of proportion. It all was just meant as constructive >>>>>>>> criticism, or >>>>>>>> so I though...I thought by posting what I did yesterday, you guys got >>>>>>>> that I >>>>>>>> was all good and tucking my tail between my legs because I realized I >>>>>>>> misinterpreted some things and was willing to make ammends. I really >>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>> trying to reopen a wound or whatever...I guess my apologies don't >>>>>>>> don't get >>>>>>>> interpreted very well. I AM SORRY GUYS! There more straight forward, >>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>> I really didn't mean to offend anyone or be so offensive. I didn't >>>>>>>> expect my >>>>>>>> comments to create such a reaction. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> Hind sight is 20/20, yea? My bad... >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >>>>>>>> >>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> >>> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 12:08 PM >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> whatever happened, i think we can all agree that with better >>>>>>>> organization and communication, we'll be in a much better position to >>>>>>>> handle >>>>>>>> things like this in the future and that there won't be as much >>>>>>>> confusion >>>>>>>> about who is doing what etc. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> Agree/Disagree? :P >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:55 AM, eric drewes < >>>>>>>> figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> here's the exhaust pipe part of the discussion (in reverse >>>>>>>> order): >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> the inside of the wagon is basically going to house the guts of >>>>>>>> clockwork artificial intelligence for the fortune teller >>>>>>>> >>>> - Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> Is it going to generate its own power, Or are the exhause pipes >>>>>>>> for things that would be assumed run on the interior? Just thinking >>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>> might not make sense???... >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> --- On Tue, 10/6/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: KATIE FINALLY FINISHED THE WAGON! >>>>>>>> >>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> >>>> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:44 AM >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> also, i was thinkign about your wagon and i think it'd be cool >>>>>>>> if it had a few exhaust pipes that could spit out smoke when you >>>>>>>> hacked the >>>>>>>> wagon/fortune teller, what do you think of that idea? >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> ------- >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM, eric drewes < >>>>>>>> figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> in reference to this: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> I think you and I have a different understanding of detail. >>>>>>>> You didn't post ANYTHING ABOUT DETAIL. You gave me one picture to go >>>>>>>> from. >>>>>>>> NOTHING ELSE. I wasn't just going to copy it. And I had to nag you to >>>>>>>> get it >>>>>>>> out of you. Which is fine, but I started working on it, then you said >>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>> that you wanted it to be Steampunk style, which was fine. I went with >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> even though I wasn't all that familiar, which I pointed out. Then >>>>>>>> after it >>>>>>>> was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and said how you'd >>>>>>>> wished >>>>>>>> it would have been different and it wasn't exactly what you were >>>>>>>> hoping for, >>>>>>>> but..It would work you guess....THEN, you asked me to add some pipes on >>>>>>>> there, but they already had pipes. Either you didn't bother to look at >>>>>>>> it, >>>>>>>> or you did but didn't tell me how you wanted them done differently >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> re: pipes, I said i wanted exhaust pipes.. you had two closed >>>>>>>> off criss-crossed pipes. i mentioned we could add exhaust pipes after >>>>>>>> wards >>>>>>>> because I thought it would look cool, I guess your confusion here was >>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>> fault for assuming you knew exhaust pipes were the pipes that let >>>>>>>> smoke come >>>>>>>> out. also, if you can show me evidence of this: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Then after it was done, or so I though you emailed me >>>>>>>> privately and said how you'd wished it would have been different and it >>>>>>>> wasn't exactly what you were hoping for, but..It would work you >>>>>>>> guess.... >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> I will literally die of shock because it NEVER HAPPENED. I >>>>>>>> never remotely said anything like that. >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> anyways, here's the discussion before you started the wagon >>>>>>>> about making it steam punk: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>>> >>>>> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:13 PM >>>>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws >>>>>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Oh right on! Thanks Kent, appreciate it. =) >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> From: katie cook >>>>>>>> >>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT) >>>>>>>> >>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws >>>>>>>> >>>>> - Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>> >>>>> Atlantis was kinda steampunk, wasn't it??? Thought that movie >>>>>>>> was really cool...=) >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws >>>>>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 11:25 AM >>>>>>>> >>>>> - Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> steampunk would be like if the victorian era never ended and >>>>>>>> technology never progressed past steam-based things. think a lot of >>>>>>>> clockwork, steam-engines, victorian style design, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> here's an image: >>>>>>>> http://gadgetsngear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/spanish-steampunk-clock.jpg >>>>>>>> >>>>> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> From: Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws >>>>>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 10:59 AM >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Did you ever see the movie Wild Wild West with Will Smith? >>>>>>>> That is steam punk. I would also recommend typing steampunk into >>>>>>>> google and >>>>>>>> select images. >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >