[project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue

  • From: Matthew Freeland <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:51:04 -0800

Indeed, and if any of your are curious as to my dealing in the past months
go check out http://pwnage.tv and check the l4d broadcasts. <3

In fact I just got back a few weeks ago from new jersey at a big lan called
GXL and there's live video of me and the crew hanging out at lan center, fun
times.


On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:02 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> its ok, you had smokers and tanks to contend with! :)
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:48 PM, <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I'm sowwy :( I won't let it happen again.
>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:48:27
>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
>>
>> yeah how dare you wurmz!  I don't think you were assigned anything
>> though :P  but I'll bug you sometime soon, I'm sure.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Freeland
>> <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Well, glad to see all this conflict started and was resolved without my
>> involvement, and it's wonderful to see everyone is friends again, now we can
>> all go back to placing blame where it needs to be: That stupid wurmz guy who
>> hasn't done anything in 4 months. GOD I hate that guy.
>> >
>> > -Wurmz
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:58 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> HERE IS ME Washing my hands of this deal, no big deal. We figured out
>> there were some hangups, so now we can progress more efficiently. =)
>> >>
>> >> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
>> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:56 PM
>> >>
>> >> High Five Alan =)
>> >>
>> >> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
>> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:10 PM
>> >>
>> >> things hopefully will be better goin forward
>> >>
>> >> as far as im concerned thats what really matters (:
>> >>
>> >> ::high fives to all::
>> >>
>> >> and making mistakes is how you learn... if we never made mistakes we'd
>> never learn anything... we are gaining valuable experience here (all of us)
>> hehe (;
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I agree as well, I have no idea how this got so out of hand and blown
>> out of proportion. It all was just meant as constructive criticism, or so I
>> though...I thought by posting what I did yesterday, you guys got that I was
>> all good and tucking my tail between my legs because I realized I
>> misinterpreted some things and was willing to make ammends. I really wasn't
>> trying to reopen a wound or whatever...I guess my apologies don't don't get
>> interpreted very well. I AM SORRY GUYS! There more straight forward, right?
>> I really didn't mean to offend anyone or be so offensive. I didn't expect my
>> comments to create such a reaction.
>> >>>
>> >>> Hind sight is 20/20, yea? My bad...
>> >>>
>> >>> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
>> >>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 12:08 PM
>> >>>
>> >>> whatever happened, i think we can all agree that with better
>> organization and communication, we'll be in a much better position to handle
>> things like this in the future and that there won't be as much confusion
>> about who is doing what etc.
>> >>>
>> >>> Agree/Disagree? :P
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:55 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> here's the exhaust pipe part of the discussion (in reverse order):
>> >>>>
>> >>>> the inside of the wagon is basically going to house the guts of
>> clockwork artificial intelligence for the fortune teller
>> >>>> - Hide quoted text -
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> Is it going to generate its own power, Or are the exhause pipes for
>> things that would be assumed run on the interior? Just thinking they might
>> not make sense???...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --- On Tue, 10/6/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: KATIE FINALLY FINISHED THE WAGON!
>> >>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:44 AM
>> >>>>
>> >>>> also, i was thinkign about your wagon and i think it'd be cool if it
>> had a few exhaust pipes that could spit out smoke when you hacked the
>> wagon/fortune teller, what do you think of that idea?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> in reference to this:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> I think you and I have a different understanding of detail. You
>> didn't post ANYTHING ABOUT DETAIL. You gave me one picture to go from.
>> NOTHING ELSE. I wasn't just going to copy it. And I had to nag you to get it
>> out of you. Which is fine, but I started working on it, then you said after
>> that you wanted it to be Steampunk style, which was fine. I went with that
>> even though I wasn't all that familiar, which I pointed out. Then after it
>> was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and said how you'd wished
>> it would have been different and it wasn't exactly what you were hoping for,
>> but..It would work you guess....THEN, you asked me to add some pipes on
>> there, but they already had pipes. Either you didn't bother to look at it,
>> or you did but didn't tell me how you wanted them done differently
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> re: pipes, I said i wanted exhaust pipes.. you had two closed off
>> criss-crossed pipes.  i mentioned we could add exhaust pipes after wards
>> because I thought it would look cool, I guess your confusion here was my
>> fault for assuming you knew exhaust pipes were the pipes that let smoke come
>> out.   also, if you can show me evidence of this:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Then after it was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and
>> said how you'd wished it would have been different and it wasn't exactly
>> what you were hoping for, but..It would work you guess....
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I will literally die of shock because it NEVER HAPPENED.  I never
>> remotely said anything like that.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> anyways, here's the discussion before you started the wagon about
>> making it steam punk:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>>>> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>>>> Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:13 PM
>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Oh right on! Thanks Kent, appreciate it. =)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> From: katie cook
>> >>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
>> >>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>> >>>>> - Hide quoted text -
>> >>>>> Atlantis was kinda steampunk, wasn't it??? Thought that movie was
>> really cool...=)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 11:25 AM
>> >>>>> - Hide quoted text -
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> steampunk would be like if the victorian era never ended and
>> technology never progressed past steam-based things.  think a lot of
>> clockwork, steam-engines, victorian style design, etc.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> here's an image:
>> http://gadgetsngear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/spanish-steampunk-clock.jpg
>> >>>>> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> From: Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 10:59 AM
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Did you ever see the movie Wild Wild West with Will Smith? That is
>> steam punk. I would also recommend typing steampunk into google and select
>> images.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>

Other related posts: