[project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue

  • From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:22:41 -0500

agree 100% - I really like the steps we've taken to stay organized and
focused.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> whatever happened, i think we can all agree that with better organization
> and communication, we'll be in a much better position to handle things like
> this in the future and that there won't be as much confusion about who is
> doing what etc.
>
> Agree/Disagree? :P
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:55 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> here's the exhaust pipe part of the discussion (in reverse order):
>>
>> the inside of the wagon is basically going to house the guts of clockwork
>> artificial intelligence for the fortune teller
>> - Hide quoted text -
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Is it going to generate its own power, Or are the exhause pipes for things
>> that would be assumed run on the interior? Just thinking they might not make
>> sense???...
>>
>>
>> --- On *Tue, 10/6/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>>
>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: KATIE FINALLY FINISHED THE WAGON!
>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:44 AM
>>
>> also, i was thinkign about your wagon and i think it'd be cool if it had a
>> few exhaust pipes that could spit out smoke when you hacked the
>> wagon/fortune teller, what do you think of that idea?
>>
>>
>> -------
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> in reference to this:
>>>
>>> I think you and I have a different understanding of detail. You didn't
>>>> post ANYTHING ABOUT DETAIL. You gave me one picture to go from. NOTHING
>>>> ELSE. I wasn't just going to copy it. And I had to nag you to get it out of
>>>> you. Which is fine, but I started working on it, then you said after that
>>>> you wanted it to be Steampunk style, which was fine. I went with that
>>>> even though I wasn't all that familiar, which I pointed out. Then after it
>>>> was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and said how you'd wished
>>>> it would have been different and it wasn't exactly what you were hoping 
>>>> for,
>>>> but..It would work you guess....THEN, you asked me to add some pipes on
>>>> there, but they already had pipes. Either you didn't bother to look at it,
>>>> or you did but didn't tell me how you wanted them done differently
>>>>
>>>>
>>> re: pipes, I said i wanted exhaust pipes.. you had two closed off
>>> criss-crossed pipes.  i mentioned we could add exhaust pipes after wards
>>> because I thought it would look cool, I guess your confusion here was my
>>> fault for assuming you knew exhaust pipes were the pipes that let smoke come
>>> out.   also, if you can show me evidence of this:
>>>
>>> Then after it was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and said
>>>> how you'd wished it would have been different and it wasn't exactly what 
>>>> you
>>>> were hoping for, but..It would work you guess....
>>>>
>>>
>>> I will literally die of shock because it NEVER HAPPENED.  I never
>>> remotely said anything like that.
>>>
>>> anyways, here's the discussion *before you started the wagon* about
>>> making it steam punk:
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:13 PM
>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>  Oh right on! Thanks Kent, appreciate it. =)
>>>
>>> *From*: katie cook
>>> *Date*: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
>>> *To*: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> *Subject*: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>>> - Hide quoted text -
>>> Atlantis was kinda steampunk, wasn't it??? Thought that movie was really
>>> cool...=)
>>>
>>> --- On *Tue, 6/30/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>>>
>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 11:25 AM
>>> - Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>>
>>> steampunk would be like if the victorian era never ended and technology
>>> never progressed past steam-based things.  think a lot of clockwork,
>>> steam-engines, victorian style design, etc.
>>>
>>> here's an image:
>>> http://gadgetsngear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/spanish-steampunk-clock.jpg
>>> --- On *Tue, 6/30/09, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 10:59 AM
>>>
>>>
>>> Did you ever see the movie Wild Wild West with Will Smith? That is steam
>>> punk. I would also recommend typing steampunk into google and select images.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts: