[project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
- From: mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx
- To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:28:18 +0000
The 27th but ill probably be there earlier
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:31:24
To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
Pittsburg is like 5 hours. When in March? I'll let you buy me a drink for
my birthday.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Matthew Freeland <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Well I'm going out to pittsburg in March for another lan if you want to get
> a drink. Preferably without threatening to kill and eat my wormly family
> members.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> I live 10 minutes for Jersey. Yay.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Matthew Freeland <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed, and if any of your are curious as to my dealing in the past
>>> months go check out http://pwnage.tv and check the l4d broadcasts. <3
>>>
>>> In fact I just got back a few weeks ago from new jersey at a big lan
>>> called GXL and there's live video of me and the crew hanging out at lan
>>> center, fun times.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:02 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> its ok, you had smokers and tanks to contend with! :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:48 PM, <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm sowwy :( I won't let it happen again.
>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:48:27
>>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
>>>>>
>>>>> yeah how dare you wurmz! I don't think you were assigned anything
>>>>> though :P but I'll bug you sometime soon, I'm sure.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Freeland
>>>>> <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Well, glad to see all this conflict started and was resolved without
>>>>> my involvement, and it's wonderful to see everyone is friends again, now
>>>>> we
>>>>> can all go back to placing blame where it needs to be: That stupid wurmz
>>>>> guy
>>>>> who hasn't done anything in 4 months. GOD I hate that guy.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -Wurmz
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:58 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> HERE IS ME Washing my hands of this deal, no big deal. We figured
>>>>> out there were some hangups, so now we can progress more efficiently. =)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
>>>>> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> >> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:56 PM
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> High Five Alan =)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
>>>>> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> >> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:10 PM
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> things hopefully will be better goin forward
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> as far as im concerned thats what really matters (:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> ::high fives to all::
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> and making mistakes is how you learn... if we never made mistakes
>>>>> we'd never learn anything... we are gaining valuable experience here (all
>>>>> of
>>>>> us) hehe (;
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> I agree as well, I have no idea how this got so out of hand and
>>>>> blown out of proportion. It all was just meant as constructive criticism,
>>>>> or
>>>>> so I though...I thought by posting what I did yesterday, you guys got
>>>>> that I
>>>>> was all good and tucking my tail between my legs because I realized I
>>>>> misinterpreted some things and was willing to make ammends. I really
>>>>> wasn't
>>>>> trying to reopen a wound or whatever...I guess my apologies don't don't
>>>>> get
>>>>> interpreted very well. I AM SORRY GUYS! There more straight forward,
>>>>> right?
>>>>> I really didn't mean to offend anyone or be so offensive. I didn't expect
>>>>> my
>>>>> comments to create such a reaction.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Hind sight is 20/20, yea? My bad...
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> >>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue
>>>>> >>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> >>> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 12:08 PM
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> whatever happened, i think we can all agree that with better
>>>>> organization and communication, we'll be in a much better position to
>>>>> handle
>>>>> things like this in the future and that there won't be as much confusion
>>>>> about who is doing what etc.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Agree/Disagree? :P
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:55 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> here's the exhaust pipe part of the discussion (in reverse order):
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> the inside of the wagon is basically going to house the guts of
>>>>> clockwork artificial intelligence for the fortune teller
>>>>> >>>> - Hide quoted text -
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>> Is it going to generate its own power, Or are the exhause pipes
>>>>> for things that would be assumed run on the interior? Just thinking they
>>>>> might not make sense???...
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> --- On Tue, 10/6/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> >>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: KATIE FINALLY FINISHED THE WAGON!
>>>>> >>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> >>>> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:44 AM
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> also, i was thinkign about your wagon and i think it'd be cool if
>>>>> it had a few exhaust pipes that could spit out smoke when you hacked the
>>>>> wagon/fortune teller, what do you think of that idea?
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> -------
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> in reference to this:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> I think you and I have a different understanding of detail. You
>>>>> didn't post ANYTHING ABOUT DETAIL. You gave me one picture to go from.
>>>>> NOTHING ELSE. I wasn't just going to copy it. And I had to nag you to get
>>>>> it
>>>>> out of you. Which is fine, but I started working on it, then you said
>>>>> after
>>>>> that you wanted it to be Steampunk style, which was fine. I went with that
>>>>> even though I wasn't all that familiar, which I pointed out. Then after it
>>>>> was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and said how you'd
>>>>> wished
>>>>> it would have been different and it wasn't exactly what you were hoping
>>>>> for,
>>>>> but..It would work you guess....THEN, you asked me to add some pipes on
>>>>> there, but they already had pipes. Either you didn't bother to look at it,
>>>>> or you did but didn't tell me how you wanted them done differently
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> re: pipes, I said i wanted exhaust pipes.. you had two closed off
>>>>> criss-crossed pipes. i mentioned we could add exhaust pipes after wards
>>>>> because I thought it would look cool, I guess your confusion here was my
>>>>> fault for assuming you knew exhaust pipes were the pipes that let smoke
>>>>> come
>>>>> out. also, if you can show me evidence of this:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> Then after it was done, or so I though you emailed me privately
>>>>> and said how you'd wished it would have been different and it wasn't
>>>>> exactly
>>>>> what you were hoping for, but..It would work you guess....
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> I will literally die of shock because it NEVER HAPPENED. I never
>>>>> remotely said anything like that.
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> anyways, here's the discussion before you started the wagon about
>>>>> making it steam punk:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> >>>>> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> >>>>> Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:13 PM
>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Oh right on! Thanks Kent, appreciate it. =)
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> From: katie cook
>>>>> >>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>> >>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>>>>> >>>>> - Hide quoted text -
>>>>> >>>>> Atlantis was kinda steampunk, wasn't it??? Thought that movie was
>>>>> really cool...=)
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 11:25 AM
>>>>> >>>>> - Hide quoted text -
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> steampunk would be like if the victorian era never ended and
>>>>> technology never progressed past steam-based things. think a lot of
>>>>> clockwork, steam-engines, victorian style design, etc.
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> here's an image:
>>>>> http://gadgetsngear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/spanish-steampunk-clock.jpg
>>>>> >>>>> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> From: Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws
>>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 10:59 AM
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Did you ever see the movie Wild Wild West with Will Smith? That
>>>>> is steam punk. I would also recommend typing steampunk into google and
>>>>> select images.
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
