Pittsburg is like 5 hours. When in March? I'll let you buy me a drink for my birthday. On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Matthew Freeland <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Well I'm going out to pittsburg in March for another lan if you want to get > a drink. Preferably without threatening to kill and eat my wormly family > members. > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> I live 10 minutes for Jersey. Yay. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Matthew Freeland <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx >> > wrote: >> >>> Indeed, and if any of your are curious as to my dealing in the past >>> months go check out http://pwnage.tv and check the l4d broadcasts. <3 >>> >>> In fact I just got back a few weeks ago from new jersey at a big lan >>> called GXL and there's live video of me and the crew hanging out at lan >>> center, fun times. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:02 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> its ok, you had smokers and tanks to contend with! :) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:48 PM, <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm sowwy :( I won't let it happen again. >>>>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:48:27 >>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >>>>> >>>>> yeah how dare you wurmz! I don't think you were assigned anything >>>>> though :P but I'll bug you sometime soon, I'm sure. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Freeland >>>>> <mattthefiend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Well, glad to see all this conflict started and was resolved without >>>>> my involvement, and it's wonderful to see everyone is friends again, now >>>>> we >>>>> can all go back to placing blame where it needs to be: That stupid wurmz >>>>> guy >>>>> who hasn't done anything in 4 months. GOD I hate that guy. >>>>> > >>>>> > -Wurmz >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:58 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> HERE IS ME Washing my hands of this deal, no big deal. We figured >>>>> out there were some hangups, so now we can progress more efficiently. =) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >>>>> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:56 PM >>>>> >> >>>>> >> High Five Alan =) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >>>>> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:10 PM >>>>> >> >>>>> >> things hopefully will be better goin forward >>>>> >> >>>>> >> as far as im concerned thats what really matters (: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> ::high fives to all:: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> and making mistakes is how you learn... if we never made mistakes >>>>> we'd never learn anything... we are gaining valuable experience here (all >>>>> of >>>>> us) hehe (; >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I agree as well, I have no idea how this got so out of hand and >>>>> blown out of proportion. It all was just meant as constructive criticism, >>>>> or >>>>> so I though...I thought by posting what I did yesterday, you guys got >>>>> that I >>>>> was all good and tucking my tail between my legs because I realized I >>>>> misinterpreted some things and was willing to make ammends. I really >>>>> wasn't >>>>> trying to reopen a wound or whatever...I guess my apologies don't don't >>>>> get >>>>> interpreted very well. I AM SORRY GUYS! There more straight forward, >>>>> right? >>>>> I really didn't mean to offend anyone or be so offensive. I didn't expect >>>>> my >>>>> comments to create such a reaction. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Hind sight is 20/20, yea? My bad... >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue >>>>> >>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 12:08 PM >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> whatever happened, i think we can all agree that with better >>>>> organization and communication, we'll be in a much better position to >>>>> handle >>>>> things like this in the future and that there won't be as much confusion >>>>> about who is doing what etc. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Agree/Disagree? :P >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:55 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> here's the exhaust pipe part of the discussion (in reverse order): >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> the inside of the wagon is basically going to house the guts of >>>>> clockwork artificial intelligence for the fortune teller >>>>> >>>> - Hide quoted text - >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> Is it going to generate its own power, Or are the exhause pipes >>>>> for things that would be assumed run on the interior? Just thinking they >>>>> might not make sense???... >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> --- On Tue, 10/6/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: KATIE FINALLY FINISHED THE WAGON! >>>>> >>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:44 AM >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> also, i was thinkign about your wagon and i think it'd be cool if >>>>> it had a few exhaust pipes that could spit out smoke when you hacked the >>>>> wagon/fortune teller, what do you think of that idea? >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> ------- >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> in reference to this: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I think you and I have a different understanding of detail. You >>>>> didn't post ANYTHING ABOUT DETAIL. You gave me one picture to go from. >>>>> NOTHING ELSE. I wasn't just going to copy it. And I had to nag you to get >>>>> it >>>>> out of you. Which is fine, but I started working on it, then you said >>>>> after >>>>> that you wanted it to be Steampunk style, which was fine. I went with that >>>>> even though I wasn't all that familiar, which I pointed out. Then after it >>>>> was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and said how you'd >>>>> wished >>>>> it would have been different and it wasn't exactly what you were hoping >>>>> for, >>>>> but..It would work you guess....THEN, you asked me to add some pipes on >>>>> there, but they already had pipes. Either you didn't bother to look at it, >>>>> or you did but didn't tell me how you wanted them done differently >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> re: pipes, I said i wanted exhaust pipes.. you had two closed off >>>>> criss-crossed pipes. i mentioned we could add exhaust pipes after wards >>>>> because I thought it would look cool, I guess your confusion here was my >>>>> fault for assuming you knew exhaust pipes were the pipes that let smoke >>>>> come >>>>> out. also, if you can show me evidence of this: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Then after it was done, or so I though you emailed me privately >>>>> and said how you'd wished it would have been different and it wasn't >>>>> exactly >>>>> what you were hoping for, but..It would work you guess.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I will literally die of shock because it NEVER HAPPENED. I never >>>>> remotely said anything like that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> anyways, here's the discussion before you started the wagon about >>>>> making it steam punk: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> >>>>> From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:13 PM >>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws >>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Oh right on! Thanks Kent, appreciate it. =) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: katie cook >>>>> >>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT) >>>>> >>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws >>>>> >>>>> - Hide quoted text - >>>>> >>>>> Atlantis was kinda steampunk, wasn't it??? Thought that movie was >>>>> really cool...=) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws >>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 11:25 AM >>>>> >>>>> - Hide quoted text - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> steampunk would be like if the victorian era never ended and >>>>> technology never progressed past steam-based things. think a lot of >>>>> clockwork, steam-engines, victorian style design, etc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> here's an image: >>>>> http://gadgetsngear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/spanish-steampunk-clock.jpg >>>>> >>>>> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws >>>>> >>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 10:59 AM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did you ever see the movie Wild Wild West with Will Smith? That >>>>> is steam punk. I would also recommend typing steampunk into google and >>>>> select images. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >