HERE IS ME Washing my hands of this deal, no big deal. We figured out there were some hangups, so now we can progress more efficiently. =) --- On Mon, 11/16/09, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:56 PM High Five Alan =) --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 1:10 PM things hopefully will be better goin forward as far as im concerned thats what really matters (: ::high fives to all:: and making mistakes is how you learn... if we never made mistakes we'd never learn anything... we are gaining valuable experience here (all of us) hehe (; On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I agree as well, I have no idea how this got so out of hand and blown out of proportion. It all was just meant as constructive criticism, or so I though...I thought by posting what I did yesterday, you guys got that I was all good and tucking my tail between my legs because I realized I misinterpreted some things and was willing to make ammends. I really wasn't trying to reopen a wound or whatever...I guess my apologies don't don't get interpreted very well. I AM SORRY GUYS! There more straight forward, right? I really didn't mean to offend anyone or be so offensive. I didn't expect my comments to create such a reaction. Hind sight is 20/20, yea? My bad... --- On Mon, 11/16/09, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [project1dev] Re: addressing one more issue To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 12:08 PM whatever happened, i think we can all agree that with better organization and communication, we'll be in a much better position to handle things like this in the future and that there won't be as much confusion about who is doing what etc. Agree/Disagree? :P On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:55 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: here's the exhaust pipe part of the discussion (in reverse order): the inside of the wagon is basically going to house the guts of clockwork artificial intelligence for the fortune teller - Hide quoted text - On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Is it going to generate its own power, Or are the exhause pipes for things that would be assumed run on the interior? Just thinking they might not make sense???... --- On Tue, 10/6/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [project1dev] Re: KATIE FINALLY FINISHED THE WAGON! To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:44 AM also, i was thinkign about your wagon and i think it'd be cool if it had a few exhaust pipes that could spit out smoke when you hacked the wagon/fortune teller, what do you think of that idea? ------- On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: in reference to this: I think you and I have a different understanding of detail. You didn't post ANYTHING ABOUT DETAIL. You gave me one picture to go from. NOTHING ELSE. I wasn't just going to copy it. And I had to nag you to get it out of you. Which is fine, but I started working on it, then you said after that you wanted it to be Steampunk style, which was fine. I went with that even though I wasn't all that familiar, which I pointed out. Then after it was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and said how you'd wished it would have been different and it wasn't exactly what you were hoping for, but..It would work you guess....THEN, you asked me to add some pipes on there, but they already had pipes. Either you didn't bother to look at it, or you did but didn't tell me how you wanted them done differently re: pipes, I said i wanted exhaust pipes.. you had two closed off criss-crossed pipes. i mentioned we could add exhaust pipes after wards because I thought it would look cool, I guess your confusion here was my fault for assuming you knew exhaust pipes were the pipes that let smoke come out. also, if you can show me evidence of this: Then after it was done, or so I though you emailed me privately and said how you'd wished it would have been different and it wasn't exactly what you were hoping for, but..It would work you guess.... I will literally die of shock because it NEVER HAPPENED. I never remotely said anything like that. anyways, here's the discussion before you started the wagon about making it steam punk: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:13 PM Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Oh right on! Thanks Kent, appreciate it. =) From: katie cook Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT) To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws - Hide quoted text -Atlantis was kinda steampunk, wasn't it??? Thought that movie was really cool...=) --- On Tue, 6/30/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 11:25 AM - Hide quoted text - steampunk would be like if the victorian era never ended and technology never progressed past steam-based things. think a lot of clockwork, steam-engines, victorian style design, etc. here's an image: http://gadgetsngear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/spanish-steampunk-clock.jpg --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Screws To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 10:59 AM Did you ever see the movie Wild Wild West with Will Smith? That is steam punk. I would also recommend typing steampunk into google and select images.