I haven't yet replied to Robert's post, in part because it doesn't answer the issue. Namely whether a relatively small population of extremist muslims with a high fertility rate would be sufficient to outstrip the much larger indigenous population with lower fertility rates. Robert provides figures for the larger aspect in both eastern and western Europe, but the information he provides doesn't include muslim extremists so there is little to work on. All that Steyn does, judging from your inclusion, is give the outline of his theory, namely that, in a couple of generations, muslims will have taken over Europe, turning it into Eurabia, based upon the discrepencies in the fertility rates. Merely expousing a theory does not, in itself, provide proof that it is sound. Steyn, if he's as bright as you suggest, must have refenced demoagraphic models or at least the work of renowned demographic scientists. Surely it can't be too difficult to access his notes and pass on those references. Is that too much to ask? Simon ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 5:57 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Seeking the Prime source You have some gall, Simon. You invited me to go off and check some things out for you and then Robert Paul out of the kindness of his heart, did that for you. I didn't respond to his note to gloat even though his information was consistent with Steyn's. But I was awaiting your mea culpa with interest. What a surprise that you didn't produce one. Except how could you not? I just checked Robert's message again to see if perchance he had sent it to me privately, but no. He sent it to the list. My opinion of your intelligence continues to plummet. It is a toss up which is lower, your intelligence or the European birth rate. Well, perhaps I am being unfair. Perhaps Robert's email reached my inbox but through some quirk in the ether missed yours; so here it is again. He begins with a quote from you, Simon: Lawrence Simon says: > The trouble is Lawrence, as I keep saying, commentators like Steyn > are preaching to the converted, espousing vacuous theories that are > at the same time wrong and yet exactly what their audience wants to > hear. All of the Steyn quotes you've transcribed relate to third > party anecdotals that appear to vindicate he's central thesis that > Islam is taking over Europe. This isn't sound academic practice as > you well know. Robert Paul responds: You might be interested in these articles. I don’t know if you can get to the ones from the Times directly from these addresses unless you have a Times account--I rather doubt it--so I’ve pasted part of the second one below. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9D0CE2DE1F39F932A05751C1A967958260 In major areas of Eastern Europe -- Hungary, eastern Germany, Romania and Ukraine -- experts expect more deaths than births in 1991. That would be a startling development, bringing Eastern Europe's population trends in line with the West's. This is more recent: 6 September 2006. http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F50616F6345A0C778CDDA00894DE404482 In 1990, no European country had a fertility rate of less than 1.3 children per woman; by 2002, there were 15, with 6 more below 1.4. No European country is maintaining its population through births, and only France -- with a rate of 1.8 --has even the potential to do so, according to a recent report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Throughout Europe, women have delayed having children, or opted out entirely. But the free fall in births is most recent and precipitous here in Eastern Europe, where Communist-era state incentives that made it economical to have children--from free apartments to subsidized child care -- have been phased out while costs have skyrocketed. New, vibrant market economies provide young people with tantalizing alternatives. Lukas and Lenka Dolansky, both journalists, would like a sibling for their 3-month-old son, Krystof, but they are not sure that would be practical. ''We want to go abroad, study, have a career,'' Mr. Dolansky said. ''Our parents didn't have those opportunities.'' The result is birthrates that are the lowest in the world -- and the lowest sustained rates in history. European Union statistics put the rate at 1.2 children per woman in the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Latvia and Poland, far below the rate of 2.1 needed to maintain population. Western European countries are also suffering: Greece, Italy and Spain have had rates of 1.3 and under for a decade. But Eastern Europe is faced with a double whammy: plummeting birthrates combined with emigration to Western Europe for work, made easier by membership in the European Union. This relies largely on the Times’ article. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=51329 Medical News Today European Birth Rates Reach Historic Low In Part Because Of Recent Fall In Eastern Europe 08 Sep 2006 Birth rates in European countries recently have reached a "historic low," with the most "precipitous" and recent fall occurring in Eastern Europe, the New York Times reports. All European countries recorded birth rates of more than 1.3 children per woman in 1990, but in 2002, 15 counties had rates below 1.3 children per woman, and six countries had rates between 1.3 and 1.4 children per woman. According to a report released recently by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, France's birth rate of 1.8 makes it the only European country with the possibility of maintaining its current population through births. In addition, the average age at which women have their first child in many countries has increased from the early 20s to around 30 in the last 20 years. European Union officials have estimated that there will be a shortage of 20 million workers in E.U. countries by 2030 if current birth rates are sustained. According to the Times, access to contraception and abortion "has turned childbearing into a choice rather than an act of nature" on the continent. In Eastern Europe, the dissolving of policies in many former Communist countries that provided child care, education and housing for couples with children has "dramatically changed the equation," the Times reports. Emerging private markets in Eastern Europe have not adequately replaced annulled government programs, and women have increased opportunities for education and careers, Jitka Rychtarikova -- a professor of demographics at Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic -- said. Almost all governments on the continent are increasing incentives to have children, and Vladimir Spidla, E.U. commissioner for employment and social affairs, has asked that every new E.U. policy be evaluated for its potential effect on demographics. Many countries in Europe offer maternity leave, but the long length and small payments during the leaves often make it difficult for women to re-enter the workforce, according to the Times (Rosenthal, New York Times, 9/4). Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. Robert Paul Reed College ------------Original Message------------ From: "Simon Ward" <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, Mar-13-2007 10:24 AM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Seeking the Prime source Lawrence, there's no need to have a hissy fit just because you've been caught out. (Teenagers eh!) And it seems we're getting back to your standard problem: that whereas you can quote a book you're reading, nobody can comment on it because they haven't read it. Tough I say. And to say that Steyn is in anyway brilliant ignores the facts of his career so far: a drop out becomes a DJ who becomes a arts critic who then (probably because of his relationship with Conrad Balck) was switched to political comment. Steyn maybe a good writer but all that I've read about him suggests that his only credible attribute is that his political views match up with what by now must be a sizeable market in right wing political punditry. So far, beyond quoting a few fertility rate figures for European countries, you have made no significant demographic argument, you have failed to note any significant demographic study, you have not once referenced a European census database, indeed, the only evidence you are able to put forward for consideration are the anecdotals that Steyn includes in his book; it's not sufficient to say that because there's a mosque next to Regent's Park it must mean that Muslims are taking over Britain, or that because somebody in the Netherlands has been stabbed by a Muslim, that country only has a fews years to go before it adopts muslim laws. Evidence that will impress me must include a statistical demographic model showing how a Muslim minority of less than one per cent of the population (with fertility rates exceeding 2) can and will outstrip the remaining 99 per cent (with fertility rates just exceeding 1), bearing in mind that the relevent muslim population for your argument are extremists. Since you're clearly a demographic expert, get on Excel, construct the model and show the results. Alternatively, search on Google and see what you can find. Alternatively you could just revert to type and either call me an idiot or else reject what I have to say because I've disqualified myself by not reading Steyn or Huntingdon. Simon