Andreas: It is impossible that I could "believe" you about Huntington because. You haven't read him and are speaking well beyond your knowledge. Besides, you haven't said that much. You continue doing your Leftist thing via personal attacks. Once I eliminate those from your comments, you have said almost nothing about Huntington. And now you throw out an "oh yeah! well how about this" argument; which isn't an argument at all as it turns out.. Perhaps you expect me to read the Wikipedia article and figure out what the heck you're talking about and why you think this proves something you haven't adequately articulated. Well, I can't do that. I can't make sense of something that isn't sensible, but I can read the article and say what I think of it. It isn't terribly bad. It doesn't take a serious anti-Huntington stance. If you skim the article you might obtain the idea that it does, but if you read the whole thing you'll discover that isn't the case. No one can disprove either Huntington or Fukuyama at this point. It is too soon to tell. The Wiki-writer describes some of the objections to Huntington's thesis, but he doesn't take up the major objection, that of Fukuyama's End of History. There is one small passage that alludes to the Fukuyama concept, but he doesn't develop it or credit Fukuyama for it. Toward the end, the reviewer demonstrates a lack of understanding of Huntington when he writes, "Probably the most severe critic of Huntington's theory, however, has been Huntington himself: unnoticed by many of his readers, Huntington has modified his Clash of Civilizations theory by using youth bulge theory as its foundation: 'I don't think Islam is any more violent than any other religions, and I suspect if you added it all up, more people have been slaughtered by Christians over the centuries than by Muslims. But the key factor is the demographic factor. Generally speaking, the people who do out and kill other people are males between the ages of 16 and 30'. So in Essence, Huntington has shifted from a clash of civilizations theory to a demographic theory of war, social unrest and violence." This comment by the Wiki-writer indicates a lack of understanding of Huntington's thesis. Huntington described that very thing in his book; so he isn't deviating from his book when he makes such a comment. Clashes will most likely occur when youth of a certain age are feeling feisty and looking for trouble. This was mentioned by Steyn and I recognized it as having come from Huntington's book; so it does NOT represent a modification of Huntington's view. I read a recent article in which Huntington was asked whether he intended his thesis to apply to the world forever, and he said that he did not. He intended his thesis to apply to the world near-term -- something like 50 or 100 years. I can't remember the number but it wasn't long term. Huntington doesn't imagine himself a Hari Seldon. The "war on terror" concept does not fit either Huntington's or Fukuyama's thesis very well. Fukuyama has a vested interest in making light of this war; so it isn't surprising that he embraced Olivier Roy's Globalized Islam. He believes that the End of history has arrived and the winding up of minor problems like the Islamist thing is nothing more than sweeping up the final historical debris and putting it in the dust bin. And Huntington sees his clashes originating in Civilizational constructs, one Civilization being no more violent than the other. Yes, we are seeing the Islamic civilization exerting itself now, but there will be other more serious clashes in the future. By the way, Steyn's comments about China undercut Huntington's belief that China will eventually replace the US as the dominant world power. China has enforced a population-reduction policy; which suggests to Steyn that China will not (in the foreseeable future) have the young feisty youthful population necessary to do any serious clashing. Also, it is very interesting that Huntington's book is popular in the Middle East. His thesis is very popular there. The list of possible clashes at the need of the article was interesting. Lawrence ------------Original Message------------ From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, Mar-12-2007 11:31 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Seeking the Prime source Okay, since you won't believe me, try this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clash_of_Civilizations yrs, andreas www.andreas.com