>Judy says that my post was irrelevant (I think that's what she said) >to the subject of this thread Yes. On the assumption that its subject is not (as I agree on one reading, it could be) the ability of Europe to sustain adequate population growth by intra-European migration. I take Steyn's statement (as summarized by Lawrence) that "the European birthrate (is), with the single exception of France, incapable of maintaining its current level of population. " to mean "non-Muslim European population" (see my excerpt from Hari's review of Steyn), and I assumed the thread centred around the notion that Muslims would become the majority in all European countries (France, perhaps, apart). If though Steyn is simply saying that migration within Europe cannot, alone, offset the ageing of Europe's population, of course I agree. (But he isn't.) Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Paul" <rpaul@xxxxxxxx> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:06 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Seeking the Prime source Lawrence quotes Simon > The trouble is Lawrence, as I keep saying, commentators like Steyn > are preaching to the converted, espousing vacuous theories that are > at the same time wrong and yet exactly what their audience wants > to hear. All of the Steyn quotes you've transcribed relate to third > party anecdotals that appear to vindicate he's central thesis > that Islam is taking over Europe. This isn't sound academic > practice as you well know. and understandably writes that I responded to this ('Robert Paul responds:'), for that is the quote from Simon I began with. This has led to some confusion that is mostly my fault. I had meant to begin by citing this paragraph from Simon 'The Prime Source in this debate about demographics is, surprisingly enough, demographics, not political commentary. Try looking on the net for European census data, do some work, then come back with some results. And a hint, don't forget the young Eastern Europeans - all most all of child bearing age - that are streaming into Western Europe looking to work, looking to benefit from western culture, looking to perpetuate it. Does Steyn mention these new immigrants at all?' I have no interest in Steyn or his theories, not because I believe they are empirically false but because (from reading what's been posted here and from clicking on the recommended clickable lines) it's clear to me that he makes no real empirical claims, nor does his ideological mentor, Huntington. Both deal with abstractions at such a high level that my inherent nominalism makes me reject the whole enterprise. Steyn's claims, from what I can see, come closer to offering a theory (?) that can be confirmed or falsified; I see no hope for Huntington, with his clashing 'civilizations.' To return to the point. I was replying--by offering information gained from sources that are as close to being 'primary' as I could find--to the suggestion that migration from Eastern to Western Europe would solve Western Europe's population crisis. It won't. According to Simon, who may not have bothered to look at them, the sources I cited do not give information about migration patterns. They do. Judy says that my post was irrelevant (I think that's what she said) to the subject of this thread. It was not irrelevant to what Simon said, and what he said was, I thought then, part of 'this thread.' To say, as Simon does, that I have 'not provided break downs within the population relating to, for example, white (sic) indigenous Europeans, [M]uslim immigrants or east European immigration' is disingenous. To say that I haven't provided data on emigration from Eastern Europe to the West, is a bit strange; that was the main burden of my post. Robert Paul Reed College ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html