The trouble is, Simon, that you don't know what you're talking about. You already admitted that you haven't read Steyn; yet you persist in trying to tell me what he says and knows. That fits just about anyone's of "dumb.". If you want blow smoke, and fake it, don't do it with the guy who knows you are blowing smoke and faking it. You write as though you have an intellectual death wish. We've gotten into demographics a number of times in the past on Phil-Lit and Lit-Ideas, especially several years ago as a result of reading Samuel P. Huntington, a legitimate scholar who utilizes demographics in his arguments. He bases major portions of his theories about the clashes of civilizations upon his demographic studies. Had you read Huntington you wouldn't be writing as you do. Huntington is vital to what Steyn is writing, by the way. Anyone making comments on these subjects unless they don't mind seeming to be ignorant, needs to read Huntington. Steyn gives evidence of reading Huntington. Read Huntington and then try and tell me again that demographics are self-authenticating. Read his references and you will learn that people are devoting their lives to interpreting demographics and yet you presume to know as much as they do by calling up something on Google? Tell me again about your education. Steyn is a very bright fellow and anyone who thinks that he isn't, hasn't read him or is so prejudiced that they can't think clearly. To attack him as being uneducated, which both you and Hari do, and in the process produce writings that are far beneath what Steyn is producing, reflects on you and not Steyn. Steyn in a brilliant writer. You and Hari, if Hari's review is any example, are inferior to him by several orders of magnitude. Lawrence ------------Original Message------------ From: "Simon Ward" <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, Mar-12-2007 6:00 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Seeking the Prime source Ah the climb down. No proof pending clearly. The trouble is Lawrence, as I keep saying, commentators like Steyn are preaching to the converted, espousing vacuous theories that are at the same time wrong and yet exactly what their audience wants to hear. All of the Steyn quotes you've transcribed relate to third party anecdotals that appear to vindicate he's central thesis that Islam is taking over Europe. This isn't sound academic practice as you well know. So now it turns out that even as you keep pasting the walls of Lit-Ideas with Steyn's words you don't actually agree with what he has to say. The Prime Source in this debate about demographics is, surprisingly enough, demographics, not political commentary. Try looking on the net for European census data, do some work, then come back with some results. And a hint, don't forget the young Eastern Europeans - all most all of child bearing age - that are streaming into Western Europe looking to work, looking to benefit from western culture, looking to perpetuate it. Does Steyn mention these new immigrants at all? Simon