Hi Bill! You suggested I'd changed my views on panos... > Quite a change from a previous remark you made about panos on January 7: > > "I suppose I could have taken a 3 panel pano, but they too, are not without > their distortions ..." > > I guess HugIn came to the rescue, eh? Nope. I've been using Hugin for some time. The difference is that this shot was made outdoors. Here's one I'd shown before, taken inside a covered railway bridge, where I could only get b ack some 10 or 12 feet. http://www.furnfeather.net/Panos/ChambersInside.html Here, the distortion induced by a pano is painfully obvious. And this is a 3 panel pano. The outdoor version, http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/PH2015_Pano.html is a 6 panel pano, but because I am far back and there are no distinct grid lines, the distortions are far less obvious. My comment, in January, referred to taking a shot in our hotel room. Using a pano, would have looked much like the railway bridge. Clear as mud? David. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/