[HUG ] Re: A16 back
- From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:08:13 -0700
Not my experience.... I have not yet bought an A16 back because the A12
backs are cheaper.....
I am looking for some reasonably priced A32 backs... anyone ?
Frank Filippone
red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Q.G. de Bakker
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 4:09 PM
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [HUG ] Re: A16 back
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> An A16S is a nice source of parts for an A16 that needs them. I found
> one (practically new) recently for around 20 EURObucks.
An A16 is also a nice source for parts an A16 may need.
Also cheap. And, compared to A16S backs, positively abundant.
So why reduce the numbers of A16S backs that are out there to fix a more
common A16? Don't!
============================================================================
=================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
