On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, James Leone wrote: > Leon Timmermans wrote: > > >Am I missing the point? > >Someone stealing our is the biggest compliment a programer can get! > >Those who are worried about 'stealing' of our code should ask themselves > >what OBOS' goal is. > >"It's an open source effort to first recreate and then extend a most > >excellent, once-commercially-supported, closed-source, media-oriented > >desktop computer operating system called the Be operating system (BeOS). > >......The goal of OpenBeOS R1 is to be source- and binary-compatible with > >BeOS R5. Improvements to OpenBeOS will follow only after R1 is completed." > >We want to make a good (the best?) desktop OS, right? > > > Up front and honest here, I have not contributed code to this, cause I > really don't know how to....so take this as you will... > > If Be, Inc. had changed the license for the BeOS to the GPL, you all > would have a lot less work to do. ;) > > Now I know some people may enjoy coding. So, I say the fact that the > people are making the operating system instead of applications is a step > backwards for the movement in general. > > We already have a base operating system that is available for gratis, > the BeOS. So why would people want to make another one? > > I'll tell you why. > > Its because they want the source to be open, so what happened to BeOS > will not happen again, so that proprietary interests cannot make it go away. > > In the case of Free BSD, many of the cool features included in it have > been taken, and enhanced to no benefit of the community. These > improvements could die with a proprietary company that is bought out, > just like the BeOS code did. > > So, my vote it to definitely go with the GPL, so future coders won't > have to do this all over again. Please stop this rather pointless discussion. The choice of license has been made a long time ago and won't be undone, unless all contributors suddenly decide to do so. Which a strongly doubt. CU, Ingo