"Allen Brunson" <brunsona@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > François Revol wrote: > > I think we should move OpenBFS from MIT to LGPL to make sure > > Apple doesn't rip it off... (but maybe it's too late) :) > You guys are being silly. BFS was *Dominic's* idea, not yours. The > very > idea that he or anybody else at Apple would even *look* at your code > is > absurd. You overestimate yourselves by an order of magnitude. > Dominic > could probably re-write BFS from scratch in a couple of weeks by > himself, Exactly! With the one exception that he really did look at the code. He is also just a (hu)man :-) > and it would be even better this time, since he knows what he did > wrong the > last time. Even I know now ;-) > Personally I'd like nothing better than for MacOSX to move to an > exact > binary-compatible BFS duplicate, lock stock and barrel. It's the OS > I've > moved to since the demise of Be and I know BFS beats the pants off > HFS+, so > it would make my life a lot easier. Well, I can assure you that this won't happen, fixing the problems in BFS alone makes this next to impossible, but I don't think that Apple has any interest in doing so as well. Adios... Axel.