On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:57 PM Adrien Destugues <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
14 mars 2019 21:33 "Dario Casalinuovo" <b.vitruvio@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit:
Hi, going to comment on something that I find interesting. I'm copyingfrom web, so sorry if some
formatting is lost.you
His comments on discuss are really way over the top. No, you must call
people names, and no, you cannot demand from them never to mention you
anywhere. That's really insane in an open source project. Barrett, if
discuss with him and he kindreally want that, you'd have to fork.
I asked that to waddlesplash because I perceived it was impossible to
of spread bad informations about me.
You also asked "including in activity reports". And again you asked in a
needlessly agressive way.
I get pinged by waddlesplash on WebKit bugs all the time. My answer is
"I'm bored to be alone working
on this, here are possibly responsible parts of the code, please help me
and have a look". Sharing
knowledge. Yours is "stop mentioning me, I don't want to hear from you". I
hope you see the difference
and how by doing that, you are isolating yourself?
IRC channel, he stated that
For example one time he challenged me about my contract in the public
he knew why my contract wasn't extended. He said that it was because Ididn't have any API (false).
At some point in this same discussion he mentioned that PulkoMandydecided that my contract it
wasn't worth. I think this is a case where he just wanted to get meupset. Mostly because I clearly
remember PulkoMandy being positive about my work.
And I obviously have no decision in that, because I'm not part of the Inc.
I've been bit by the management problems in the Inc (in my case it was "we
don't know if we can pay
you next month, you have 15 days to find another job"), and waddlesplash
with his work on the package
builbdbot had some issues as well. So please do not set yourself as a lone
victim here. You may more
strongly remember your own case because you got through it personally, but
it is not the only contract
which ended up this way. You do not know what the situation was for other
contracts. And you chose to
be very aggressive about it, still today pretending that the Inc and the
project are personally turned
against you while this was clearly not the case.
I hoped we could restore some level of mutual trust. Today I can only see
that we failed. I am not
happy about this. But if we are at a point where you assume ill intentions
from me/the Inc/the project,
and/or I assume bad intentions from you, then we cannot work together
anymore.
It was introduce to reviewThat's not the only problem, last time he already unsubscribed himself
from both main mailing lists as far as I know. Bypassing this and code
review,
Again, when it was discussed that development should be done in gerrit?
external contributors work. I already told you many times, that I don'tremember that decision
being taken, and that I like much more ml reviews. I also told you thatif a vote was done that
decided that, I'd be OK as long as *everyone* was forced to use it.what it is, yes I behaved
I think you are making the whole thing about reviews much bigger than
badly with you in a discussion, I already asked sorry. I can't do morethan that.
It is not mandatory, but you are not understanding what it's useful for.
See my reply to your previous mail.
In short: review allows other people to explore your code and understand
it. You can't complain that
we don't understand your code if you don't make the effort to educate us
(I already discussed this with you)
and I find code review is a great tool for that.
If you chose to not use it, or if you decide to ignore
comments from people reviewing your changes
or get into useless fights with them, you are making sure no
one will read, therefore understand, your code.
he is essentially already writing code on its own, and using ourevidence?
hosting infrastructure. He keeps forum and IRC, and the haiku-commits
mailing list but will get very agressive whenever someone attempts to
Except the media_format discussion mentioned, can you give us some
Is that not enough evidence?
You gave it yourself in your previous mail, there was that discussion with
Jua about latency, and
there were a few other cases.