On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:33:53PM -0400, Ron Kuper wrote: > Seriously, I want GMPI 1.0 to succeed and get to market. What if we had > typed parameters to keep it open ended, but for version 1.0 we only used > MIDI? I fear that the job of defining what to use instead of MIDI will > take us longer than the rest of the spec. And then we'll have another > attempt at MIDI 2.0 to sell to the rest of the world. If we can find a sane way for the host to be kept in sync with the state of the plugin, then I will happily relent. If that means some sort of setParameterAutomated() that everyone can live with, then OK. I'll happily rewrite all the stuff about actors and parameters being external, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe