[geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth Deception
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:33:22 +1000
Hooray! another piece of intellectual property release from the GWW, for us
poorer class intellectual peasants.. thanks Robert. er I dont suppose you could
give us just a we bit more about this NASA experiment and that lack of
aberration in the return signal..
I realy do not see why aberration comes into it. If it takes 2 seconds to get
here, then the antennaes even at ordinary radio beam will find an offset in
space of quite some distance relatively, given the velocity a the equator.
Now I need to get some perspective, and perhaps all may need it.
1. A radio signal takes 2 seconds to do the distance luna to earth.
2. A 2 millisecond pulse after it leaves the moon antenna, having no mass or
inertia will travel in a straight line independently of any further movement of
the moon or its g forces.
3. It will also travel in a straight line, no curves for the fructuous,
independent of the movements of the earth . or any gravitional forces thereof.
( no einstein please)
4. If the pulse was sent during that time when luna was 90 degrees inside
the alleged earths orbit around the sun, then the receiving antennae on earth
will be moving forward around the sun at 2.978473 x 104 m/s
I dunno about anyone else but it seems to me that the pulze is going to miss
the antenna by more than 60 kilometers. Miss is arbitary .. I mean miss the
peak amplitude.. One is comparing signal strengths on the curve between in
focus and off focus..
Philip.
side issues of a technical nature.. Keep in mind that the moon is not where it
is seen by about 2.5 seconds. the receiving antenna should be set to look at
that spot where the moon (transmitter) really is, not where it appears to be..
and It must be left at that setting for more the duration of the pulse travel
time. the signals need to be well up in the higher than radar range, to obtain
narrow beam and resolution accuracy. Of course a laser would be the best if the
aim could be set to such accuracy, but the longer waves make it easier, and
well we have 60k m to play with
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Bennett
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 5:55 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth Deception
Americans? Moon? Wait a minute - do we have any proof that they exist? J
GWW accepts the NASA conspiracy of laser lunar ranging and points out - on
P. 826,7 - that the lack of aberration in the return signal, as reported by MS,
shows that stellar aberration - a key proof of HC - does not apply to the
Moon. The echo signal returns on the same path, as though the Earth were still
in space. This conflict is explained by the usual shouts of silence from the MS
demagogues.
Too bad this disproof of HC is part of a huge fraud perpetrated by NASA - it
would have served well as a counter-argument to HC & MS.
Robert B
.By the way, if the Americans had landed on the Moon, and if they had
deposited a laser reflector, and if we could hit it with 100% of a laser beam,
then we could prove whether the universe was acentric or geostationary, based
upon similar reasoning that you are exercising above.
Neville.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date: 24/07/2007
1:50 PM
Other related posts:
