Ben Kucenski wrote: >Obviously it wasn't misleading to you because you knew the extent of the >source that was available. And hence "corrected" me. > > That doesnt make any sense, but you certainly dont like being corrected. >When I said the code was available I didn't say "all" of it now did I? > oh, you got me. ZIIING!!!! Because its obvious that when you say "Quake 3, Half-Life, and other major games have had their source code opened for a long time" you didnt really mean all of it. I was playing an elaborate joke. >You >were *alledgedly* mislead because you read too much into what I said. The >code for Quake 3 is available. The entire code will be available later. > > I just read what you said, and took it at face value. How else is one supposed to read it? You should type what you mean. >Does this stupid little argument excite you? Because I'm bored. > > Translation : I need a cop out for an argument i started. I know! I'll pull out the nonchalant "bored" argument :) You need to chill. --------------------- To unsubscribe go to http://gameprogrammer.com/mailinglist.html