I'm having a non FG weekend. Been neglecting my other peeps a bit. Football,beer and steak time ! On 4 March 2014 20:24, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > yes, im in. > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:03:44 +0200 > Subject: Re: hi > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > *lol* Gettin schooled by the prof... classic :P > > Got the following message from Genshiken: > > "Hi there Ryan, > > Would you and CTS be interested in helping us host a gaming event on > Friday at all, should you be available?" > > Waiting for specifics. > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Lol, I told him but come on, the guy isn't really going to attend every > weekend. Maybe he'll come to a CTS though. > > He used my hori, I used pad. > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Stephen Scheidel > <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > Kevin is OP > > > On 4 March 2014 18:18, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What controller did he use. > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:17 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Let him know about the sessions. He sounds legit. > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was seriously shocked. He had feint cancels and everything. > > Then again, he is asian, so it makes sense. > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That awkward moment when your professor schools you. > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Was playing AE with Skamanke today.This guy and his backdash button -_- > > Anyway, got to my supervisor for another meeting and he saw my hori and > was like "wow! You have a joystick?" > > I'm like "yeah, just for some fun", obviously I wasn't just going to go > all into it with my prof. He is like "Fun? You should play Mark of the > Wolves or The Last Blade. Those are real games, made by SNK. No Capcom > rubbish" > > We played. > > The guy has combos... His Kevin is broken -_- > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > Not sure > > But it seems like it roughly. > > Used to able to run MP7-8 > > Now Torment 2 seems to be the sweet spot me atm. > > > Game work differently tho so its hard to directly compare. > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:45:28 +0000 > > > Is master lvl = mp3 , torment 1 =5? > > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:06:47 +0000 > > Arcane Power on Crit > > ------------------------------ > From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:00:17 +0200 > Subject: Re: hi > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Apoc? > > Yeah, i think it's fair that blizzard nerfed the whole perma-mindless spam > build. It makes the game a bit boring. I like how the new patch introduced > so many new different types of builds. At one point everyone is basically > the same lolz but now you can have fun a bit. > > To bad they fixed the WD more than 10 zombie dog bug. (The bug is that, > zombie dogs that didn't spawn from the "Zombie Dog" skill itself doesn't > count towards max zombie dogs allowed. So passive and other skills that > gives zombie dogs when a monster dies stays...) saw a vid with 10 zombie > dogs. looks fun :) I think they removed this bug because it cause > performance issue...i mean just the 0 CD with 3 zombie dog build is already > stifling performance of the game. > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > Damage and build variety is waaaaay better from the looks of it. > > Perma builds got nerfed ofcourse like everybody. Perma freeze or Perma > Archon etc. and Apoc in general > > ------------------------------ > From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:43:47 +0200 > > Subject: Re: hi > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Poor WD lolz > > didn't they nerf Wiz too? > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/forum/2823159/ > > Problem is that with the new patch there are far too many people posting > 'builds' that are just their random choice of skills. > > Dunno exactly how thing are going but Monk/Wiz > DH/Barb. Don't care how > the WD is doing. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:31 PM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: hi > > > How's monk in 2.0.1? i'm still not feeling the class...maybe i just don't > like their playstyle :/ What new builds do they have other than dashing > strike, bells, cyclone? > > DH looks very good in 2.0.1 now. Will main DH now :) > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Il play monk to get paragon and keys. I want to play somethng difrent > nw. Helfire rings r op in 2.0. > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:24:37 +0000 > > Also LB, don't be playing the Barb expecting to be OP or anything. A lot > of the casual Barb players are migrating to Monk because he's so much > stronger now than the Barb. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:22 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: hi > > Sap is playing wizard. I had to resort to using follower coz i kept dying > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:09 +0000 > Wizard! > > > Frozen orb is boss > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:14:37 +0000 > Don't worry too much about them because you can always reset them. > > Go with res-all before +% life. > Your movement speed (total, including equip) should be +25%. I get 12% > from Inna Pants, 12% from Lacuni and 1% from paragon levels. > Go with attack speed. > > Depending on your build, some other things change - like whether you want > splash damage. > > The Barb has been nerfed massively, especially in comparison to the Monk. > Don't expect your Barb to be unkillable anymore. Also don't expect any > perma-builds. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:06 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: hi > > Aah okay i see thanks. I duno where to put my paragon levels, everythng > luks gud. > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000 > Oh wait, are you talking about a WW Barb? I thought you meant the twirly > Monk thing. > > Viable WW builds now? Uh, not really there. Well, you can get them, but > you need to be properly equipped. > > Previously you used Battle Rage > Into the Fray so that crit hits > generated fury. Then WoTB > Thrive on Chaos allowed you to add time to WoTB > for fury generated. > As long as you had crit chance of around 40% unbuffed, your passives and > skills could push this past 80%. That meant you'd never run out of fury as > long as you hit enough people fast enough. > > HoTA - crit chance higher if you've got full fury - meant that my crit > chance was around 95% for HoTA. > > For WW barb, you added the WW rune that lets you attack at your movement > speed. Then you add Sprint with the Tornados. They proc'd enough to > generate your non-stop fury. WW dealt the damage to kill. Throw in Rend to > make you Immortal and you're good to go. > > A proper working WW barb would set you back only around 50m. > > > TL:DR - these builds no longer work - you can't generate fury from crit > hits. L2P > > Superstition is a great passive now for fury generation. Against elemental > elites, you will never run out of fury. You can perma-HoTA them. As long as > your fury spent to life is high enough, you can live doing this. > > http://us.battle.net/d3/en/calculator/barbarian#ahdRSk!hYe!ZcYcZb > > That's the sort of thing you should go for if you want a WW build these > days. > > Also, the Barbarian is not a ballerina. Stop using WW. > > Also, your BB is level 26 or some crap. Come back when you're max level > and we'll talk again. There are no builds for low level Barbs. Get level > reduced gear and shove gems in there. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:44 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: hi > > Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up that spin > dammit. > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000 > You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax online, > right? Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to SARS to > pre-populate the tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax every > year. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:38 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: hi > > Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin. How > did ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3? > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200 > Subject: Re: hi > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he > is just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration > didn't? > You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way. > Remember, Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just > remembered the situation from before and progressively punished harder > after getting hit by it once. There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind > it. He just adapted to what Sanford was doing. There's no luck involved > either. Given the number of options players have at that range, it's > extremely hard to perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that > counter higher in your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you > hit me with a focus attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with an > Ultra? Same thing. The difference is that the way Infiltration handled it > there was no easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly. > cr.mk xx tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would cr.hkxx > demon. > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I suppose "I don't know". > Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I got > hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has > something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter". > I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I > always go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will > shoot left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the > best option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent in > any living organism. > Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will > be to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie > changes too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at least > gives me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a > single thing. > > Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an > anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is > scary. DP could just be from reaction. > > TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart. It > catches you unawares and you lose the match :-) > Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though. > So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if > Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if > Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't? > Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying, > doesn't really matter. > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > > > > > >