Done! https://ciphershed.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=35#p211 Luis > Titanus, maybe you should put a link somewhere we won't lose it (the forums?) > to your Google doc, so that we still have the work you did, in case we need > to re-open the branding issue? Heck, maybe make it an actual github issue as > well? > > Alain > > -----Original Message----- > From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Titanus Aegis > Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:40 > To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Rebranding > > > Thanks for compiling the names into that table, Titanus! Could you change > > the sharing settings to make it editable by anyone with the link, so others > > can add potential names and information? > > Done. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen R Guglielmo > > Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 07:33 > > To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Rebranding > > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm really not the right guy to say what names are good. My first domain > > > was GeekCrypt :-) I think if Alain says we should seriously consider > > > switching to a particular name, I would listen to her. For now, in my > > > ignorant opinion, I still like CipherShed. > > > > "her"? I think you have the wrong gender there Bill :-P > > > > Honestly, the discussion about changing the name AGAIN is something I > > have no interest in even reading. I'm trying to focus on our goals and > > get some coding done to get a release out. I'm not trying to mean > > here, but I personally don't have time for this (again, I don't mean > > that in an angry way, I just literally have limited time on the > > computer). If the rebranding is done with CipherShed, but then we > > change the name and have to rebrand again, I'll be pretty frustrated. > > > > > > >