I take it we've settled on the CipherShed brand then? Since we're moving onto rebranding tasks? On 11/06/2014 14:47, Alain Forget wrote: > Gotcha. Never mind then; carry on with the rebranding. :-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen R Guglielmo > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 09:45 > To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Rebranding > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Alain Forget <aforget@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> This may have already been discussed, and I'm guessing the answer lies >> somewhere in license issues, but I'm wondering if a rebranding is really >> necessary. People already know and trust the name TrueCrypt, so for most >> people who don't care to learn the forking history of software, rebranding >> will cause some loss of recognition and trust, at least if/until CipherShed >> captures the popularity of TrueCrypt. > > It's legally necessary :-P > > https://ciphershed.org/License > > -- -- At the time of writing, no warrants have been served to me, nor am I under any legal compulsion concerning the CipherShed project. I do not know of any searches of seizures of my assets.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
