[ciphershed] Re: Rebranding
- From: "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx>
- To: <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 08:49:50 -0400
In other parallel e-mail threads, we're talking about our organisation name
that will be on our Publisher code certificates, SSL certificates for our
domain, and e-mail domains, and a refresh of our website to make it more
user-friendly (and less of a dev-tool type website). Through all these
discussions, we're still very strongly using the "CipherShed" name.
So unless anyone has any strong objections, at least for the sake of progress
on all these other fronts (not to mention the core software's own rebranding!),
I elect that we stick with "CipherShed" for the time being. We can always
reopen the discussion at any time of course, especially if it becomes apparent
that it's causing us public image problems. However, for right now, I think we
need a firm identity, and we all seem sufficiently comfortable with
"CipherShed" being it.
Titanus, maybe you should put a link somewhere we won't lose it (the forums?)
to your Google doc, so that we still have the work you did, in case we need to
re-open the branding issue? Heck, maybe make it an actual github issue as well?
Alain
-----Original Message-----
From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Titanus Aegis
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:40
To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Rebranding
> Thanks for compiling the names into that table, Titanus! Could you change the
> sharing settings to make it editable by anyone with the link, so others can
> add potential names and information?
Done.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen R Guglielmo
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 07:33
> To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Rebranding
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm really not the right guy to say what names are good. My first domain
> > was GeekCrypt :-) I think if Alain says we should seriously consider
> > switching to a particular name, I would listen to her. For now, in my
> > ignorant opinion, I still like CipherShed.
>
> "her"? I think you have the wrong gender there Bill :-P
>
> Honestly, the discussion about changing the name AGAIN is something I
> have no interest in even reading. I'm trying to focus on our goals and
> get some coding done to get a release out. I'm not trying to mean
> here, but I personally don't have time for this (again, I don't mean
> that in an angry way, I just literally have limited time on the
> computer). If the rebranding is done with CipherShed, but then we
> change the name and have to rebrand again, I'll be pretty frustrated.
>
>
Other related posts:
