astrojanek@xxxxxxxxxx writes: > Indeed the most important thing we have to develop is a very precise and al= > so very open to extending (but still following the specification) data form= > at. I fully agree on openness, and I think precision will come, at the right rate. For now it would be nice for the system to enjoy a healthy wave of stimuli and ideas; it will settle on the best ones spontaneously. > to make a better/easier CAD editor for this. Someone is good at spline math= > ? Great, he will only write a program that allows drawing splines. someone = > is good at 3d bool operations? great! - he can now write only this. without= > interfering with the rest of the data. Right. One can think in terms of CAD `platform' rather than `application'. > ah, well. the only thing I personally miss the most is my autocad style of = > drawing... with command line, just some command <space> <space> <click> <cl= > ick> <space> m <space> <click> (another two-letter command)... that's very = > fast method to work. And yet there are no opensourde cad applications that = > allow that. Perhaps one based on this file format will be made? > > As a intermediate linux C++ programmer I'm eager to help. One thing there's no lack of is areas in need of development. :-) I guess higher level topics, such as interface design, file format, general model of data manipulation are on topic and of interest here. For discussion about the nitty-gritty implementation details you're welcome to join the devel mailing list (http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xspace-devel). Massimiliano