[bookport] Re: In defense of Double Talk

  • From: "Suzanne" <suzerb1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:11:40 -0400

There are actually some aspects of DoubleTalk that I like better than
Eloquence.  Suzanne

-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Donald L. Roberts
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:06 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: In defense of Double Talk

To those on the list who are constantly complaining about Double 
Talk, I think they should be required to read four or five books 
using the Echo Cricket from Street Electronics.

Don Roberts

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Crystal French" <raincrow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:25 AM
Subject: [bookport] In defense of Double Talk


For my two cents, I have no problem with Eloquence, or Double 
Talk.

I have lived enough years to remember only too well a time when 
access to
printed material was very limited.

So, Eloquence and Double Talk sound like normal people to me.

In fact, Perfect Paul and I have a very nice relationship, thank 
you very
much, and I am happy to hear that he will be continued in BP II.

Crystal





-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.11/722 - Release Date: 
3/14/2007 3:38 PM






Other related posts: