[bookport] Re: In defense of Double Talk
- From: "William Stephan" <wstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:34:28 -0600
Crystal's right!
Some of us who've been doing this for a while can still remember when synthetic
speech sounded about like someone reading through a kazoo.
Since folks can apparently designate whatever speech engine they want to use on
a file-by-file basis, I'm not sure why which synthesizer is used is
particularly significant in any case.
-----Original Message-----
.From: "Crystal French"<raincrow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.Sent: 3/15/07 9:25:01 AM
.To: "bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"<bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.Subject: [bookport] In defense of Double Talk
.
.For my two cents, I have no problem with Eloquence, or Double Talk.
.
.I have lived enough years to remember only too well a time when access to
.printed material was very limited.
.
.So, Eloquence and Double Talk sound like normal people to me.
.
.In fact, Perfect Paul and I have a very nice relationship, thank you very
.much, and I am happy to hear that he will be continued in BP II.
.
.Crystal
.
.
.
.
Other related posts:
